PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVSB vs. TFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVSB vs. TFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CVSB having a 1.49% return and TFLR slightly lower at 1.45%.


CVSB

1D
0.05%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.49%
6M
2.05%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
10Y*

TFLR

1D
0.02%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.45%
6M
2.19%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVSB vs. TFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVSB
Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF
1.49%4.92%6.23%5.40%
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
1.45%6.57%8.77%9.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CVSB and TFLR is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

-0.01

The correlation between CVSB and TFLR shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.00 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVSB vs. TFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVSB
CVSB Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CVSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CVSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLR
TFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVSB vs. TFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVSBTFLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.20

2.95

+2.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

8.98

4.39

+4.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.41

1.69

+0.72

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

20.15

2.68

+17.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

81.98

12.31

+69.67

CVSB vs. TFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVSB Sharpe Ratio is 5.20, which is higher than the TFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVSB and TFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVSBTFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.20

2.95

+2.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.14

2.19

+1.95

Drawdowns

CVSB vs. TFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVSB drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum TFLR drawdown of -4.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVSB and TFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVSBTFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-4.01%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.23%

-2.18%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.63%

-4.01%

+3.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.02%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-0.21%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

0.47%

-0.41%

Volatility

CVSB vs. TFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB) is 0.16%, while T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) has a volatility of 0.42%. This indicates that CVSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVSBTFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.16%

0.42%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.54%

1.72%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88%

1.97%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.32%

3.68%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.32%

3.68%

-2.36%

CVSB vs. TFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than TFLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVSB vs. TFLR - Dividend Comparison

CVSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than TFLR's 6.76% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CVSB
Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF
4.37%4.72%5.13%4.95%0.00%
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
6.76%6.93%8.18%7.76%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVSB and TFLR have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFLR has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to CVSB (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVSB dropped -0.63% vs TFLR's -4.01%.

On 3-year performance, TFLR leads with 8.14% vs 5.54% for CVSB. On fees, CVSB is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, CVSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TFLR has performed better with a 8.14% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVSB is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TFLR.

TFLR has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 4.37% for CVSB.

CVSB is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TFLR is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for CVSB and 0.60% for TFLR.

CVSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.20 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVSB and TFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer