CVMIX vs. FQEMX
CVMIX (Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and FQEMX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 3 years, CVMIX returned 25.96%/yr vs 50.22%/yr for FQEMX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CVMIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQEMX.
Performance
CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVMIX achieves a 35.32% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 92.59% return.
CVMIX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 35.32%
- 6M
- 37.29%
- 1Y
- 64.03%
- 3Y*
- 25.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
FQEMX
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 16.94%
- YTD
- 92.59%
- 6M
- 100.00%
- 1Y
- 157.54%
- 3Y*
- 50.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 35.32% | 36.77% | 6.37% | 4.74% | -22.57% | -6.08% |
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM | 92.59% | 55.98% | 6.67% | 12.18% | -20.68% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVMIX and FQEMX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between CVMIX and FQEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVMIX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank
CVMIX
FQEMX
CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVMIX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.84 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 8.64 | -4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.27 | 31.63 | -14.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVMIX drawdown since its inception was -43.96%, which is greater than FQEMX's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMIX and FQEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVMIX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.96% | -34.46% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -18.93% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.48% | -18.93% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | 0.00% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -10.72% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 5.12% | -1.38% |
Volatility
CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) is 11.90%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 18.80%. This indicates that CVMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVMIX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 18.80% | -6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.40% | 29.31% | -8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.56% | 32.17% | -9.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 22.29% | -3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 22.29% | -3.56% |
CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison
CVMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than FQEMX's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.67% | 2.26% | 0.63% | 0.92% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.41% | 0.68% | 1.24% | 0.27% | 0.84% | 1.26% |
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM | 1.65% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 4.82% | 3.93% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVMIX and FQEMX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FQEMX has higher volatility (18.80%) compared to CVMIX (11.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMIX dropped -43.96% vs FQEMX's -34.46%.
FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.10 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVMIX and FQEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer