CVMIX vs. FQEMX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CVMIX (Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and FQEMX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, CVMIX returned 21.27%/yr vs 39.56%/yr for FQEMX. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CVMIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQEMX.

Performance

CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVMIX achieves a 23.37% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 57.68% return.

CVMIX

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -1.42%
• 6M: 11.90%
• YTD: 23.37%
• 1Y: 44.42%
• 3Y*: 21.27%
• 5Y*: 6.05%
• 10Y*: 9.38%
• ALL TIME*: 7.64%

FQEMX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -4.58%
• 6M: 32.52%
• YTD: 57.68%
• 1Y: 98.89%
• 3Y*: 39.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund	23.37%	36.77%	6.37%	4.74%	-22.57%	-6.08%
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM	57.68%	55.98%	6.67%	12.18%	-20.68%	0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CVMIX and FQEMX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021	0.86

The correlation between CVMIX and FQEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CVMIX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVMIX

CVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
CVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
CVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FQEMX

FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CVMIX	FQEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.77	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	2.98	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.48	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	3.89	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.65	13.98	-4.33

CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the FQEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMIX and FQEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMIX drawdown since its inception was -43.96%, which is greater than FQEMX's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMIX and FQEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVMIX	FQEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.96%	-34.46%	-9.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.03%	-26.96%	+10.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.48%	-26.96%	+9.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.32%	-18.13%	+8.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.13%	-10.82%	-3.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	7.45%	-2.66%

Volatility

CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) is 10.80%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 16.86%. This indicates that CVMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVMIX	FQEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.80%	16.86%	-6.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.82%	35.78%	-11.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.75%	37.97%	-12.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.77%	23.95%	-4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.07%	23.95%	-4.88%

CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

CVMIX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison

CVMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than FQEMX's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund	1.83%	2.26%	0.63%	0.92%	0.79%	0.76%	0.41%	0.68%	1.24%	0.27%	0.84%	1.26%
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM	2.02%	3.18%	3.15%	4.82%	3.93%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVMIX and FQEMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, CVMIX and FQEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CVMIX or FQEMX?

FQEMX has higher volatility (16.86%) compared to CVMIX (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMIX dropped -43.96% vs FQEMX's -34.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.