CVMIX vs. FHKFX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CVMIX (Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and FHKFX (Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CVMIX returned 6.05%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for FHKFX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CVMIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHKFX.

Performance

CVMIX vs. FHKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CVMIX having a 23.37% return and FHKFX slightly lower at 23.08%.

CVMIX

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -1.42%
• 6M: 11.90%
• YTD: 23.37%
• 1Y: 44.42%
• 3Y*: 21.27%
• 5Y*: 6.05%
• 10Y*: 9.38%
• ALL TIME*: 7.64%

FHKFX

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -1.23%
• 6M: 10.39%
• YTD: 23.08%
• 1Y: 42.56%
• 3Y*: 22.51%
• 5Y*: 7.64%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FHKFX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CVMIX vs. FHKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund	23.37%	36.77%	6.37%	4.74%	-22.57%	-7.43%	24.88%	22.65%	-6.96%
FHKFX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund	23.08%	38.51%	5.42%	12.10%	-24.50%	-4.15%	17.85%	9.64%	-8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CVMIX and FHKFX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018	0.94

The correlation between CVMIX and FHKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CVMIX vs. FHKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVMIX

CVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
CVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
CVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FHKFX

FHKFX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FHKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FHKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FHKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FHKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FHKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVMIX vs. FHKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CVMIX	FHKFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.88	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	2.40	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.34	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	3.08	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.65	9.87	-0.22

CVMIX vs. FHKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FHKFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMIX and FHKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CVMIX vs. FHKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMIX drawdown since its inception was -43.96%, roughly equal to the maximum FHKFX drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMIX and FHKFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVMIX	FHKFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.96%	-45.47%	+1.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.03%	-14.49%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.48%	-16.71%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.08%	-39.01%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.32%	-8.95%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.13%	-17.00%	+2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	4.51%	+0.28%

Volatility

CVMIX vs. FHKFX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) has a higher volatility of 10.80% compared to Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) at 9.36%. This indicates that CVMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVMIX	FHKFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.80%	9.36%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.82%	21.36%	+2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.75%	23.72%	+2.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.77%	19.96%	-0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.07%	20.17%	-1.10%

CVMIX vs. FHKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FHKFX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

CVMIX vs. FHKFX - Dividend Comparison

CVMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than FHKFX's 1.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund	1.83%	2.26%	0.63%	0.92%	0.79%	0.76%	0.41%	0.68%	1.24%	0.27%	0.84%	1.26%
FHKFX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund	1.93%	2.38%	2.86%	2.43%	2.56%	3.46%	1.38%	2.28%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVMIX and FHKFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, CVMIX and FHKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CVMIX or FHKFX?

CVMIX has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to FHKFX (9.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMIX dropped -43.96% vs FHKFX's -45.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.