PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVMIX vs. CULAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVMIX vs. CULAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) and Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVMIX achieves a 34.84% return, which is significantly higher than CULAX's 1.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CVMIX has outperformed CULAX with an annualized return of 11.25%, while CULAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.


CVMIX

1D
-0.89%
1M
10.46%
YTD
34.84%
6M
38.45%
1Y
64.13%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
11.25%

CULAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.34%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVMIX vs. CULAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVMIX
Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund
34.84%36.77%6.37%4.74%-22.57%-7.43%24.88%22.65%-15.23%44.71%
CULAX
Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund
1.34%4.55%5.69%6.07%-0.56%0.43%0.66%3.30%1.15%1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CVMIX and CULAX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.09

The correlation between CVMIX and CULAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVMIX vs. CULAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVMIX
CVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CULAX
CULAX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CULAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CULAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CULAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CULAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CULAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVMIX vs. CULAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) and Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVMIXCULAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

4.15

-2.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

13.98

-9.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.76

56.95

-38.20

CVMIX vs. CULAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is comparable to the CULAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMIX and CULAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVMIXCULAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

3.22

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

2.53

-2.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

1.75

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

2.07

-1.59

Drawdowns

CVMIX vs. CULAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMIX drawdown since its inception was -43.96%, which is greater than CULAX's maximum drawdown of -7.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMIX and CULAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVMIXCULAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.96%

-7.40%

-36.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.95%

-0.30%

-14.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.48%

-0.30%

-17.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.71%

-2.19%

-38.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.96%

-7.40%

-36.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

0.00%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.22%

-0.21%

-14.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

0.07%

+3.47%

Volatility

CVMIX vs. CULAX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) has a higher volatility of 9.10% compared to Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) at 0.31%. This indicates that CVMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CULAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVMIXCULAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.10%

0.31%

+8.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.63%

0.84%

+16.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.14%

1.31%

+18.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

1.35%

+17.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

1.42%

+17.05%

CVMIX vs. CULAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CULAX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVMIX vs. CULAX - Dividend Comparison

CVMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than CULAX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CULAX
Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund
3.91%4.13%4.90%4.52%1.47%0.64%1.25%2.44%2.10%1.13%1.10%0.66%
CVMIX
Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.67%2.26%0.63%0.92%0.79%0.76%0.41%0.68%1.24%0.27%0.84%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVMIX and CULAX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVMIX has higher volatility (9.10%) compared to CULAX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMIX dropped -43.96% vs CULAX's -7.40%.

CVMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 3.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVMIX and CULAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer