CVMIX vs. CLDAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CVMIX (Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and CLDAX (Calvert Core Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - CVMIX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Calvert Research and Management, while CLDAX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Calvert Research and Management. Over the past 10 years, CVMIX returned 11.25%/yr vs 3.04%/yr for CLDAX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. CVMIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CLDAX.

Performance

CVMIX vs. CLDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVMIX achieves a 34.84% return, which is significantly higher than CLDAX's -0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CVMIX has outperformed CLDAX with an annualized return of 11.25%, while CLDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.04% annualized return.

CVMIX

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: 10.46%
• YTD: 34.84%
• 6M: 38.45%
• 1Y: 64.13%
• 3Y*: 25.86%
• 5Y*: 6.82%
• 10Y*: 11.25%

CLDAX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: -0.17%
• 6M: 0.05%
• 1Y: 4.27%
• 3Y*: 3.64%
• 5Y*: -0.23%
• 10Y*: 3.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVMIX vs. CLDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund	34.84%	36.77%	6.37%	4.74%	-22.57%	-7.43%	24.88%	22.65%	-15.23%	44.71%
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund	-0.17%	7.27%	1.39%	5.04%	-13.48%	-2.30%	14.56%	20.77%	-5.73%	9.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CVMIX and CLDAX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	-0.05

The correlation between CVMIX and CLDAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CVMIX vs. CLDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVMIX

CVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 89
CVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

CLDAX

CLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 19
CLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
CLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
CLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVMIX vs. CLDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVMIX	CLDAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.30	1.24	+2.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.07	1.84	+2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.22	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.45	1.51	+2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.76	4.70	+14.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVMIX vs. CLDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the CLDAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMIX and CLDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVMIX	CLDAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30	1.24	+2.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	-0.04	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.45	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.82	-0.34

Drawdowns

CVMIX vs. CLDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMIX drawdown since its inception was -43.96%, which is greater than CLDAX's maximum drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMIX and CLDAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVMIX	CLDAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.96%	-18.88%	-25.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.95%	-3.24%	-11.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.48%	-6.09%	-11.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.71%	-18.21%	-22.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.96%	-18.88%	-25.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.89%	-3.59%	+2.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.22%	-3.92%	-10.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	1.04%	+2.50%

Volatility

CVMIX vs. CLDAX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) has a higher volatility of 9.10% compared to Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) at 1.46%. This indicates that CVMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVMIX	CLDAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.10%	1.46%	+7.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.63%	2.92%	+14.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.14%	3.95%	+16.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.48%	5.64%	+12.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.47%	6.81%	+11.66%

CVMIX vs. CLDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CLDAX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

CVMIX vs. CLDAX - Dividend Comparison

CVMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than CLDAX's 4.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund	4.23%	4.24%	4.16%	3.17%	1.80%	6.08%	5.22%	3.04%	3.63%	3.02%	7.02%	2.85%
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund	1.67%	2.26%	0.63%	0.92%	0.79%	0.76%	0.41%	0.68%	1.24%	0.27%	0.84%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVMIX and CLDAX in my portfolio?

CVMIX and CLDAX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CVMIX or CLDAX?

CVMIX has higher volatility (9.10%) compared to CLDAX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMIX dropped -43.96% vs CLDAX's -18.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.