PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVLOX vs. CVGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVLOX vs. CVGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX) and Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLOX achieves a 19.22% return, which is significantly higher than CVGRX's 11.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CVLOX has underperformed CVGRX with an annualized return of 11.57%, while CVGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.85% annualized return.


CVLOX

1D
0.59%
1M
6.83%
YTD
19.22%
6M
19.51%
1Y
31.04%
3Y*
21.82%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
11.57%

CVGRX

1D
-0.11%
1M
6.96%
YTD
11.13%
6M
10.25%
1Y
28.10%
3Y*
24.26%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
14.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVLOX vs. CVGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVLOX
Calamos Global Opportunities Fund
19.22%15.84%23.81%13.88%-22.17%15.72%31.76%18.28%-9.88%20.04%
CVGRX
Calamos Growth Fund
11.13%16.08%32.32%37.64%-33.33%23.06%32.97%31.11%-6.14%26.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CVLOX and CVGRX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 1996

0.85

The correlation between CVLOX and CVGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVLOX vs. CVGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLOX
CVLOX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CVLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CVLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

CVGRX
CVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVLOX vs. CVGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX) and Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVLOXCVGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

1.80

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.94

6.76

+5.19

CVLOX vs. CVGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the CVGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLOX and CVGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVLOXCVGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.75

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.59

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.69

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.51

+0.08

Drawdowns

CVLOX vs. CVGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLOX drawdown since its inception was -46.61%, smaller than the maximum CVGRX drawdown of -61.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLOX and CVGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVLOXCVGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.61%

-61.65%

+15.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-16.00%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-23.81%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-37.43%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.97%

-37.43%

+7.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.99%

-11.50%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

4.26%

-1.65%

Volatility

CVLOX vs. CVGRX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) at 3.69%. This indicates that CVLOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVLOXCVGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

3.69%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

12.71%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

16.48%

-2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

21.81%

-7.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.78%

21.61%

-6.83%

CVLOX vs. CVGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CVGRX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVLOX vs. CVGRX - Dividend Comparison

CVLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, less than CVGRX's 7.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVGRX
Calamos Growth Fund
7.93%8.81%6.66%4.48%0.00%12.17%11.25%9.71%16.86%13.75%4.12%35.24%
CVLOX
Calamos Global Opportunities Fund
7.61%9.10%8.15%0.61%0.00%5.71%6.11%1.28%12.65%6.04%0.68%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVLOX and CVGRX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVLOX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to CVGRX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLOX dropped -46.61% vs CVGRX's -61.65%.

CVLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVLOX and CVGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer