PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVISX vs. PCLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVISX vs. PCLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVISX achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly lower than PCLAX's 36.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CVISX having a 11.59% annualized return and PCLAX not far behind at 11.33%.


CVISX

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.35%
YTD
16.15%
6M
19.77%
1Y
33.51%
3Y*
25.88%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
11.59%

PCLAX

1D
0.57%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
36.60%
6M
35.76%
1Y
45.73%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
15.51%
10Y*
11.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVISX vs. PCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVISX
Causeway International Small Cap Fund
16.15%32.93%9.71%26.74%-11.51%21.30%2.48%18.55%-21.34%34.52%
PCLAX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
36.60%4.13%5.76%-0.14%22.73%43.18%-9.67%19.19%-12.47%10.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CVISX and PCLAX is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.32

The correlation between CVISX and PCLAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVISX vs. PCLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVISX
CVISX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CVISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVISX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CVISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVISX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

PCLAX
PCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVISX vs. PCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVISXPCLAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

6.83

-3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

17.57

-6.65

CVISX vs. PCLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the PCLAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVISX and PCLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVISXPCLAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.44

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.80

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.28

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.15

+0.50

Drawdowns

CVISX vs. PCLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVISX drawdown since its inception was -48.50%, smaller than the maximum PCLAX drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVISX and PCLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVISXPCLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.50%

-68.19%

+19.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-6.93%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.17%

-13.76%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-21.75%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.50%

-52.00%

+3.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-4.77%

+4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-25.66%

+16.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.69%

+0.36%

Volatility

CVISX vs. PCLAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) is 3.46%, while PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that CVISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVISXPCLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

6.95%

-3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

16.84%

-5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

19.49%

-5.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

19.53%

-3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

40.66%

-23.84%

CVISX vs. PCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVISX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLAX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVISX vs. PCLAX - Dividend Comparison

CVISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.26%, more than PCLAX's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVISX
Causeway International Small Cap Fund
14.26%16.56%10.60%6.14%2.75%3.48%3.42%3.57%2.91%8.23%2.78%2.00%
PCLAX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
1.24%1.20%5.20%4.58%44.24%75.67%0.45%2.07%18.31%12.18%0.09%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVISX and PCLAX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCLAX has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to CVISX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVISX dropped -48.50% vs PCLAX's -68.19%.

PCLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVISX and PCLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer