PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVGRX vs. CVLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVGRX vs. CVLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) and Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVGRX achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly lower than CVLOX's 15.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CVGRX has outperformed CVLOX with an annualized return of 14.72%, while CVLOX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.52% annualized return.


CVGRX

1D
-2.17%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
4.67%
6M
3.25%
1Y
17.17%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
14.72%

CVLOX

1D
-2.70%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
15.00%
6M
13.85%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
11.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVGRX vs. CVLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVGRX
Calamos Growth Fund
4.67%16.08%32.32%37.64%-33.33%23.06%32.97%31.11%-6.14%26.58%
CVLOX
Calamos Global Opportunities Fund
15.00%15.84%23.81%13.88%-22.17%15.72%31.76%18.28%-9.88%20.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CVGRX and CVLOX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 1996

0.85

The correlation between CVGRX and CVLOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVGRX vs. CVLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVGRX
CVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

CVLOX
CVLOX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CVLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CVLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVGRX vs. CVLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) and Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVGRXCVLOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.56

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.37

9.28

-4.91

CVGRX vs. CVLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the CVLOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVGRX and CVLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVGRX vs. CVLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVGRX drawdown since its inception was -61.65%, which is greater than CVLOX's maximum drawdown of -46.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVGRX and CVLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVGRXCVLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.65%

-46.61%

-15.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.00%

-9.85%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.81%

-15.16%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.43%

-29.97%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.43%

-29.97%

-7.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-3.54%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.49%

-8.98%

-2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

2.71%

+1.68%

Volatility

CVGRX vs. CVLOX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) has a higher volatility of 7.32% compared to Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX) at 6.49%. This indicates that CVGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVGRXCVLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

6.49%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

13.14%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.72%

15.43%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.00%

14.73%

+7.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.67%

14.84%

+6.83%

CVGRX vs. CVLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVGRX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than CVLOX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVGRX vs. CVLOX - Dividend Comparison

CVGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.42%, more than CVLOX's 7.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVGRX
Calamos Growth Fund
8.42%8.81%6.66%4.48%0.00%12.17%11.25%9.71%16.86%13.75%4.12%35.24%
CVLOX
Calamos Global Opportunities Fund
7.85%9.10%8.15%0.61%0.00%5.71%6.11%1.28%12.65%6.04%0.68%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVGRX and CVLOX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVGRX has higher volatility (7.32%) compared to CVLOX (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVGRX dropped -61.65% vs CVLOX's -46.61%.

CVLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVGRX and CVLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer