CVFCX vs. PCGRX
CVFCX (Pioneer Disciplined Value Fund) and PCGRX (Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - CVFCX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Amundi, while PCGRX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Amundi. Over the past 10 years, CVFCX returned 11.37%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for PCGRX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CVFCX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for PCGRX.
Performance
CVFCX vs. PCGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVFCX achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly lower than PCGRX's 15.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CVFCX has outperformed PCGRX with an annualized return of 11.37%, while PCGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.07% annualized return.
CVFCX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 21.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
PCGRX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 15.05%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 27.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
CVFCX vs. PCGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVFCX Pioneer Disciplined Value Fund | 7.31% | 17.37% | 12.11% | 8.19% | -9.69% | 27.72% | 5.64% | 29.54% | -13.17% | 21.67% |
PCGRX Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund | 15.05% | 10.84% | 10.44% | 12.38% | -5.85% | 28.94% | 1.81% | 28.04% | -19.52% | 12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVFCX and PCGRX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2001 | 0.93 |
The correlation between CVFCX and PCGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVFCX vs. PCGRX — Risk / Return Rank
CVFCX
PCGRX
CVFCX vs. PCGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Disciplined Value Fund (CVFCX) and Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund (PCGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVFCX | PCGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.64 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 12.88 | -4.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVFCX vs. PCGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVFCX drawdown since its inception was -55.99%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGRX drawdown of -53.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVFCX and PCGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVFCX | PCGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.99% | -53.63% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.13% | -7.99% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.88% | -20.29% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -20.29% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.32% | -42.30% | +6.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.32% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -7.51% | -3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.25% | +0.34% |
Volatility
CVFCX vs. PCGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pioneer Disciplined Value Fund (CVFCX) is 3.36%, while Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund (PCGRX) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that CVFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVFCX | PCGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 3.57% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 9.70% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.70% | 13.52% | -1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 17.58% | -1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 19.54% | -1.70% |
CVFCX vs. PCGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVFCX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGRX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVFCX vs. PCGRX - Dividend Comparison
CVFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, less than PCGRX's 6.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVFCX Pioneer Disciplined Value Fund | 5.45% | 5.85% | 4.65% | 2.14% | 12.02% | 23.77% | 1.25% | 1.20% | 18.94% | 15.22% | 0.95% | 25.02% |
PCGRX Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund | 6.25% | 7.19% | 9.50% | 6.92% | 12.41% | 14.24% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 12.40% | 8.35% | 6.59% | 10.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVFCX and PCGRX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCGRX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to CVFCX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVFCX dropped -55.99% vs PCGRX's -53.63%.
PCGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVFCX and PCGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer