CVAR vs. SNPD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cultivar ETF (CVAR) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD).

CVAR and SNPD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CVAR is an actively managed fund by Cultivar. It was launched on Dec 22, 2021. SNPD is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2022.

Performance

CVAR vs. SNPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cultivar ETF (CVAR) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CVAR vs. SNPD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CVAR Cultivar ETF	-0.40%	14.95%	3.12%	11.74%	4.15%
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	4.62%	6.66%	5.41%	2.68%	3.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVAR achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than SNPD's 4.62% return.

CVAR

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: -7.18%
• YTD: -0.40%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 10.52%
• 3Y*: 7.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNPD

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -6.31%
• YTD: 4.62%
• 6M: 5.72%
• 1Y: 9.12%
• 3Y*: 7.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVAR vs. SNPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVAR has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than SNPD's 0.15% expense ratio.

CVAR

Cultivar ETF

SNPD

Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Return for Risk

CVAR vs. SNPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVAR

CVAR Risk / Return Rank: 37
CVAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CVAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CVAR Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CVAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
CVAR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

SNPD

SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 34
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVAR vs. SNPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cultivar ETF (CVAR) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVAR	SNPD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	0.62	+0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	0.98	+0.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.13	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	0.88	+0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	3.39	+0.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVAR vs. SNPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the SNPD Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVAR and SNPD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVAR	SNPD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	0.62	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.52	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between CVAR and SNPD is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CVAR vs. SNPD - Dividend Comparison

CVAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than SNPD's 3.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CVAR Cultivar ETF	1.53%	1.53%	3.57%	1.41%	5.52%
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.11%	3.10%	2.78%	2.63%	0.57%

Drawdowns

CVAR vs. SNPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVAR drawdown since its inception was -19.39%, which is greater than SNPD's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVAR and SNPD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVAR	SNPD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.39%	-15.80%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.62%	-11.68%	+1.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.18%	-6.31%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.49%	-3.93%	-1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	3.02%	-0.05%

Volatility

CVAR vs. SNPD - Volatility Comparison

Cultivar ETF (CVAR) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) have volatilities of 3.76% and 3.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVAR	SNPD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	3.66%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.81%	7.93%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.80%	14.75%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.70%	13.22%	+2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.70%	13.22%	+2.48%