CUT vs. USFR
CUT (Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CUT is a Materials fund tracking the Beacon Global Timber Index, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CUT returned 4.69%/yr vs 2.43%/yr for USFR. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. CUT charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
CUT vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUT achieves a -4.36% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CUT has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 4.69%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.
CUT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- -4.36%
- 6M
- -3.02%
- 1Y
- -4.86%
- 3Y*
- 1.55%
- 5Y*
- -3.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
CUT vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | -4.36% | -5.92% | 1.82% | 8.65% | -16.38% | 12.29% | 18.05% | 23.35% | -21.70% | 30.41% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.78% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUT and USFR is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUT vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
CUT
USFR
CUT vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CUT | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -50.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 13.24 | -12.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 200.29 | -200.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | 775.73 | -776.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CUT vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUT drawdown since its inception was -70.03%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUT and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUT | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.03% | -1.36% | -68.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.62% | -0.02% | -19.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.23% | -0.06% | -22.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.40% | -0.18% | -30.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.76% | -0.80% | -44.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.00% | 0.00% | -22.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -0.15% | -15.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.50% | 0.01% | +9.49% |
Volatility
CUT vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.08%. This indicates that CUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUT | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 0.08% | +4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.23% | 0.19% | +14.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.86% | 0.27% | +18.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 0.40% | +18.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 0.78% | +19.43% |
CUT vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CUT vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
CUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | 2.57% | 2.46% | 3.05% | 2.44% | 2.58% | 1.57% | 1.65% | 2.67% | 3.43% | 1.57% | 2.08% | 1.52% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CUT and USFR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CUT has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to USFR (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUT dropped -70.03% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 10-year performance, CUT leads with 4.69% vs 2.43% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CUT has performed better with a 4.69% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CUT.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.57% for CUT.
CUT is categorized as Materials, while USFR is Government Bonds. CUT tracks Beacon Global Timber Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CUT and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CUT and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer