PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUSUX vs. NWAUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CUSUX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund (CUSUX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CUSUX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CUSUX
Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund
-9.56%19.35%24.86%30.38%-21.28%24.00%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
9.70%-4.92%27.90%18.30%-3.23%22.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUSUX achieves a -9.56% return, which is significantly lower than NWAUX's 9.70% return.


CUSUX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-7.02%
YTD
-9.56%
6M
-6.09%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*

NWAUX

1D
0.74%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
9.70%
6M
7.83%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CUSUX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUSUX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CUSUX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUSUX
CUSUX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CUSUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUSUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUSUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CUSUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUSUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

NWAUX
NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUSUX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund (CUSUX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUSUXNWAUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

0.49

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

0.73

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.10

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

0.58

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.43

1.36

+2.06

CUSUX vs. NWAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUSUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the NWAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUSUX and NWAUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CUSUXNWAUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

0.49

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.79

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.83

-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between CUSUX and NWAUX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CUSUX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison

CUSUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.15%, more than NWAUX's 4.69% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
CUSUX
Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund
10.15%9.18%6.64%1.19%2.68%16.48%1.55%1.67%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
4.69%4.35%13.58%0.40%1.93%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CUSUX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUSUX drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSUX and NWAUX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CUSUXNWAUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.55%

-21.07%

-14.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-8.87%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.55%

-21.07%

-14.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.01%

-7.03%

-3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-6.85%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

3.83%

-0.70%

Volatility

CUSUX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison

Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund (CUSUX) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) at 2.74%. This indicates that CUSUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CUSUXNWAUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

2.74%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

7.29%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.74%

12.58%

+6.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

16.10%

+4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.69%

16.05%

+5.64%