PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUSUX vs. FLVCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CUSUX vs. FLVCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund (CUSUX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUSUX achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than FLVCX's 26.99% return.


CUSUX

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
6.57%
6M
5.62%
1Y
23.02%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*

FLVCX

1D
1.44%
1M
9.26%
YTD
26.99%
6M
25.31%
1Y
44.76%
3Y*
29.79%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
16.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUSUX vs. FLVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CUSUX
Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund
6.57%19.35%24.86%30.38%-21.28%30.27%22.69%24.95%-11.01%
FLVCX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund
26.99%20.34%26.95%26.10%-22.99%26.08%26.74%35.60%-20.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CUSUX and FLVCX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.87

The correlation between CUSUX and FLVCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUSUX vs. FLVCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUSUX
CUSUX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CUSUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUSUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUSUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CUSUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUSUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FLVCX
FLVCX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FLVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FLVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUSUX vs. FLVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund (CUSUX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CUSUXFLVCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.56

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

12.93

-4.27

CUSUX vs. FLVCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUSUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FLVCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUSUX and FLVCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CUSUX vs. FLVCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUSUX drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, smaller than the maximum FLVCX drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSUX and FLVCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUSUXFLVCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.55%

-70.02%

+34.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-13.06%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.64%

-28.54%

+8.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.55%

-28.54%

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

0.00%

-2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.59%

-10.98%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

3.59%

-0.80%

Volatility

CUSUX vs. FLVCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund (CUSUX) is 4.98%, while Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that CUSUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUSUXFLVCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

9.08%

-4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

18.05%

-7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

22.29%

-9.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

23.07%

-2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.52%

23.51%

-1.99%

CUSUX vs. FLVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUSUX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FLVCX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

CUSUX vs. FLVCX - Dividend Comparison

CUSUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%, more than FLVCX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUSUX
Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund
8.61%9.18%6.64%1.19%2.68%16.48%1.55%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLVCX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund
3.72%4.72%14.53%12.19%18.49%8.40%0.11%0.10%19.91%18.96%27.48%6.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


CUSUX and FLVCX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLVCX has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to CUSUX (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUSUX dropped -35.55% vs FLVCX's -70.02%.

FLVCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUSUX and FLVCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer