PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUSIX vs. RYSEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CUSIX vs. RYSEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen Small Cap Value Fund (CUSIX) and Royce Special Equity Fund (RYSEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUSIX achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly lower than RYSEX's 20.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CUSIX has underperformed RYSEX with an annualized return of 8.01%, while RYSEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.24% annualized return.


CUSIX

1D
-1.22%
1M
3.70%
YTD
5.38%
6M
3.95%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
2.75%
10Y*
8.01%

RYSEX

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.87%
YTD
20.74%
6M
19.13%
1Y
34.45%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUSIX vs. RYSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CUSIX
Cullen Small Cap Value Fund
5.38%-1.21%4.80%5.77%-0.75%22.04%12.07%22.83%-9.78%0.89%
RYSEX
Royce Special Equity Fund
20.74%3.66%2.93%12.96%-6.60%22.24%7.43%12.73%-9.96%7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CUSIX and RYSEX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2009

0.85

The correlation between CUSIX and RYSEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUSIX vs. RYSEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUSIX
CUSIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CUSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CUSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

RYSEX
RYSEX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RYSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RYSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUSIX vs. RYSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen Small Cap Value Fund (CUSIX) and Royce Special Equity Fund (RYSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CUSIXRYSEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.43

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

4.45

-3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.69

14.10

-12.41

CUSIX vs. RYSEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the RYSEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUSIX and RYSEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CUSIX vs. RYSEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUSIX drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, which is greater than RYSEX's maximum drawdown of -43.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSIX and RYSEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUSIXRYSEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.46%

-43.25%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.49%

-8.20%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.76%

-23.03%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.76%

-23.03%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.46%

-32.13%

-13.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.08%

-1.57%

-7.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.53%

-6.34%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.78%

2.59%

+6.19%

Volatility

CUSIX vs. RYSEX - Volatility Comparison

Cullen Small Cap Value Fund (CUSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Royce Special Equity Fund (RYSEX) at 3.90%. This indicates that CUSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUSIXRYSEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

3.90%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.92%

9.23%

+6.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.52%

14.60%

+8.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.59%

16.38%

+7.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.07%

17.43%

+7.64%

CUSIX vs. RYSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUSIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RYSEX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CUSIX vs. RYSEX - Dividend Comparison

CUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than RYSEX's 10.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUSIX
Cullen Small Cap Value Fund
1.02%1.06%5.46%1.71%7.61%11.67%0.21%3.01%5.98%19.35%0.67%2.63%
RYSEX
Royce Special Equity Fund
10.23%12.36%16.35%5.32%12.34%16.53%3.70%11.56%13.11%8.24%7.72%11.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


CUSIX and RYSEX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CUSIX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to RYSEX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUSIX dropped -45.46% vs RYSEX's -43.25%.

RYSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUSIX and RYSEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer