PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUSIX vs. ENHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CUSIX vs. ENHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen Small Cap Value Fund (CUSIX) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUSIX achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly lower than ENHNX's 12.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CUSIX has outperformed ENHNX with an annualized return of 7.94%, while ENHNX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.09% annualized return.


CUSIX

1D
-0.92%
1M
-1.88%
6M
2.82%
YTD
9.66%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
7.94%
ALL TIME*
7.37%

ENHNX

1D
-1.05%
1M
0.71%
6M
7.50%
YTD
12.04%
1Y
17.04%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
5.42%
10Y*
7.09%
ALL TIME*
7.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CUSIX vs. ENHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CUSIX
Cullen Small Cap Value Fund
9.66%-1.21%4.80%5.77%-0.75%22.04%12.07%22.83%-9.78%0.89%
ENHNX
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund
12.04%6.20%6.89%0.99%-1.98%21.67%1.52%18.16%-5.10%10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CUSIX and ENHNX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.76

The correlation between CUSIX and ENHNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUSIX vs. ENHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CUSIX
CUSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CUSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CUSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ENHNX
ENHNX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ENHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ENHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CUSIX vs. ENHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen Small Cap Value Fund (CUSIX) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CUSIXENHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.23

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

2.27

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.43

6.04

-4.61

CUSIX vs. ENHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the ENHNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUSIX and ENHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CUSIX vs. ENHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUSIX drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, which is greater than ENHNX's maximum drawdown of -35.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSIX and ENHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUSIXENHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.46%

-35.59%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.49%

-6.34%

-12.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.76%

-13.60%

-18.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.76%

-18.30%

-13.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.46%

-35.59%

-9.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.39%

-1.57%

-3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-4.02%

-4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.80%

2.40%

+6.40%

Volatility

CUSIX vs. ENHNX - Volatility Comparison

Cullen Small Cap Value Fund (CUSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX) at 4.19%. This indicates that CUSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUSIXENHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

4.19%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.11%

7.88%

+7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.42%

10.54%

+12.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.48%

12.87%

+10.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.01%

15.46%

+9.55%

CUSIX vs. ENHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUSIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ENHNX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CUSIX vs. ENHNX - Dividend Comparison

CUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than ENHNX's 5.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUSIX
Cullen Small Cap Value Fund
1.27%1.06%5.46%1.71%7.61%11.67%0.21%3.01%5.98%19.35%0.67%2.63%
ENHNX
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund
5.69%4.38%5.99%6.22%3.82%7.77%5.86%5.69%6.45%6.82%7.67%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CUSIX and ENHNX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CUSIX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to ENHNX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUSIX dropped -45.46% vs ENHNX's -35.59%.

ENHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUSIX and ENHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer