PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUSIX vs. RYPNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CUSIX vs. RYPNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen Small Cap Value Fund (CUSIX) and Royce Opportunity Fund (RYPNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUSIX achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than RYPNX's 27.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CUSIX has underperformed RYPNX with an annualized return of 7.26%, while RYPNX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.74% annualized return.


CUSIX

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
3.71%
6M
2.62%
1Y
15.72%
3Y*
6.31%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
7.26%

RYPNX

1D
0.40%
1M
3.70%
YTD
27.36%
6M
30.08%
1Y
57.09%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
14.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUSIX vs. RYPNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CUSIX
Cullen Small Cap Value Fund
3.71%-1.21%4.80%5.77%-0.75%22.04%12.07%22.83%-9.78%0.89%
RYPNX
Royce Opportunity Fund
27.36%11.95%10.20%19.72%-17.19%30.34%26.52%28.24%-20.10%21.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CUSIX and RYPNX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009

0.89

The correlation between CUSIX and RYPNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUSIX vs. RYPNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUSIX
CUSIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
CUSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CUSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

RYPNX
RYPNX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RYPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RYPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUSIX vs. RYPNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen Small Cap Value Fund (CUSIX) and Royce Opportunity Fund (RYPNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUSIXRYPNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

2.69

-2.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

3.53

-2.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.44

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

4.67

-3.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.51

17.85

-16.34

CUSIX vs. RYPNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the RYPNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUSIX and RYPNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CUSIXRYPNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

2.69

-2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.37

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.58

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.53

-0.22

Drawdowns

CUSIX vs. RYPNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUSIX drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, smaller than the maximum RYPNX drawdown of -69.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSIX and RYPNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUSIXRYPNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.46%

-69.31%

+23.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.49%

-12.01%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.76%

-30.23%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.76%

-30.77%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.46%

-50.61%

+5.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.52%

-0.49%

-10.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.53%

-10.67%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.61%

3.14%

+5.47%

Volatility

CUSIX vs. RYPNX - Volatility Comparison

Cullen Small Cap Value Fund (CUSIX) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Royce Opportunity Fund (RYPNX) at 5.22%. This indicates that CUSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYPNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUSIXRYPNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

5.22%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.79%

14.60%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.44%

21.39%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.58%

24.25%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.04%

25.33%

-0.29%

CUSIX vs. RYPNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUSIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RYPNX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

CUSIX vs. RYPNX - Dividend Comparison

CUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than RYPNX's 7.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUSIX
Cullen Small Cap Value Fund
1.04%1.06%5.46%1.71%7.61%11.67%0.21%3.01%5.98%19.35%0.67%2.63%
RYPNX
Royce Opportunity Fund
7.56%9.63%7.95%4.52%5.12%22.51%0.00%1.57%10.21%14.91%6.89%10.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


CUSIX and RYPNX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CUSIX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to RYPNX (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUSIX dropped -45.46% vs RYPNX's -69.31%.

RYPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUSIX and RYPNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer