PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CUSDX vs. PRTBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CUSDX vs. PRTBX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CUSDX (Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund) and PRTBX (Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, CUSDX returned 3.08%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for PRTBX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CUSDX charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PRTBX.

Performance

CUSDX vs. PRTBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund (CUSDX) and Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUSDX achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than PRTBX's 0.84% return.

CUSDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.78%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
—

PRTBX

1D
0.05%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.84%
6M
0.92%
1Y
2.85%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
1.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUSDX vs. PRTBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CUSDX
Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund		1.63%3.64%5.96%5.13%-0.64%0.04%2.06%0.87%-0.30%
PRTBX
Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio		0.84%4.19%4.12%3.79%-2.28%-0.74%0.10%1.76%0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CUSDX and PRTBX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2018

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund

Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio

Often compared with CUSDX:
CUSDX vs. FJTDXCUSDX vs. DFYGXCUSDX vs. BUBIXCUSDX vs. FHCOXCUSDX vs. BUBSXCUSDX vs. CUTAXCUSDX vs. CIUEX
Often compared with PRTBX:
PRTBX vs. NVDAPRTBX vs. SGOVPRTBX vs. VFINXPRTBX vs. CBUDXPRTBX vs. PRPFXPRTBX vs. PSDSXPRTBX vs. BUBIX

Return for Risk

CUSDX vs. PRTBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CUSDX
CUSDX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CUSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CUSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
PRTBX
PRTBX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PRTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PRTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUSDX vs. PRTBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund (CUSDX) and Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CUSDXPRTBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.65
4.35

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
8.13
7.76

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.75

2.14

+1.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.71

9.09

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

55.64

43.84

+11.80

CUSDX vs. PRTBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUSDX Sharpe Ratio is 4.65, which is comparable to the PRTBX Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUSDX and PRTBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CUSDX vs. PRTBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUSDX drawdown since its inception was -1.99%, smaller than the maximum PRTBX drawdown of -5.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSDX and PRTBX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CUSDXPRTBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

-5.13%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.40%

-0.32%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.80%

-0.44%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.99%

-3.66%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-4.36%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.05%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-0.96%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

0.07%

+0.01%

Volatility

CUSDX vs. PRTBX - Volatility Comparison

Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund (CUSDX) and Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX) have volatilities of 0.22% and 0.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CUSDXPRTBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

0.22%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.55%

0.43%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92%

0.67%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.02%

1.21%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.95%

0.87%

+0.08%

CUSDX vs. PRTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUSDX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PRTBX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CUSDX vs. PRTBX - Dividend Comparison

CUSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than PRTBX's 3.36% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CUSDX
Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund		4.14%3.28%4.76%3.25%1.70%0.84%1.63%0.67%0.00%
PRTBX
Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio		3.36%3.39%2.69%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.21%1.65%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

CUSDX and PRTBX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRTBX has higher volatility (0.22%) compared to CUSDX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUSDX dropped -1.99% vs PRTBX's -5.13%.

CUSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.65 vs 4.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUSDX and PRTBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer