CUSDX vs. CMIUX
CUSDX (Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund) and CMIUX (Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund) are both mutual funds - CUSDX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Six Circles, while CMIUX is a Europe Equities fund managed by Six Circles. Over the past 5 years, CUSDX returned 3.01%/yr vs 9.72%/yr for CMIUX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CUSDX charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for CMIUX.
Performance
CUSDX vs. CMIUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUSDX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than CMIUX's 7.41% return.
CUSDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
CMIUX
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 19.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- —
CUSDX vs. CMIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUSDX Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund | 1.42% | 3.64% | 5.96% | 5.13% | -0.64% | 0.04% | 2.06% | 0.37% |
CMIUX Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund | 7.41% | 33.36% | 2.63% | 20.07% | -12.61% | 19.72% | 9.26% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUSDX and CMIUX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUSDX vs. CMIUX — Risk / Return Rank
CUSDX
CMIUX
CUSDX vs. CMIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund (CUSDX) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CUSDX | CMIUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.02 | 1.25 | +2.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.98 | 1.75 | +9.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 57.60 | 6.45 | +51.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CUSDX | CMIUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.80 | 1.35 | +3.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.98 | 0.55 | +2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.39 | 0.56 | +1.83 |
Drawdowns
CUSDX vs. CMIUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUSDX drawdown since its inception was -1.99%, smaller than the maximum CMIUX drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSDX and CMIUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUSDX | CMIUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.99% | -36.83% | +34.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.40% | -11.76% | +11.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.80% | -14.30% | +13.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.99% | -29.49% | +27.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.60% | +2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -5.73% | +5.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 3.18% | -3.10% |
Volatility
CUSDX vs. CMIUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund (CUSDX) is 0.23%, while Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX) has a volatility of 5.28%. This indicates that CUSDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUSDX | CMIUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.23% | 5.28% | -5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.54% | 12.86% | -12.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91% | 15.30% | -14.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.02% | 17.85% | -16.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.95% | 19.73% | -18.78% |
CUSDX vs. CMIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUSDX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CMIUX's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CUSDX vs. CMIUX - Dividend Comparison
CUSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than CMIUX's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMIUX Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund | 2.44% | 2.62% | 2.96% | 2.25% | 2.98% | 1.93% | 1.81% | 1.55% |
CUSDX Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund | 4.15% | 3.28% | 4.76% | 3.25% | 1.70% | 0.84% | 1.63% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CUSDX and CMIUX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMIUX has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to CUSDX (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUSDX dropped -1.99% vs CMIUX's -36.83%.
CUSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.80 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CUSDX and CMIUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer