CUSD vs. SPTU
CUSD (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. CUSD is actively managed, while SPTU is passively managed. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CUSD charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
CUSD vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUSD achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly higher than SPTU's 2.10% return.
CUSD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.80%
SPTU
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $32.95K | $32.90K | $66.95K |
CUSD vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF | 2.92% | 0.06% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.10% | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUSD and SPTU is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUSD vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CUSD | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CUSD vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUSD drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSD and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUSD | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -0.04% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -0.01% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | 0.00% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | — | — |
Volatility
CUSD vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUSD | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.25% | 0.32% | +15.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.04% | 0.32% | +7.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.04% | 0.32% | +7.72% |
CUSD vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUSD has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CUSD vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
CUSD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF | 13.65% | 14.05% | 7.10% | 3.62% | 1.14% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.97% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CUSD and SPTU have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for CUSD.
CUSD has the higher dividend yield at 13.65%, compared with 2.97% for SPTU.
They also come from different issuers: CrossingBridge and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for CUSD and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for CUSD and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer