CURLF vs. GTBIF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Green Thumb Industries Inc (GTBIF).

Performance

CURLF vs. GTBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Green Thumb Industries Inc (GTBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CURLF vs. GTBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CURLF Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.	-15.08%	61.54%	-61.58%	-5.52%	-52.25%	-24.82%	89.73%	33.12%	-18.97%
GTBIF Green Thumb Industries Inc	-20.61%	-1.64%	-27.64%	30.67%	-61.01%	-9.55%	151.28%	21.42%	-27.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CURLF : $1.65B GTBIF : $1.50B
EPS CURLF : -$0.30 GTBIF : $0.49
PS Ratio CURLF : 1.27 GTBIF : 1.27
PB Ratio CURLF : 2.19 GTBIF : 0.78
Total Revenue (TTM) CURLF : $1.29B GTBIF : $1.18B
Gross Profit (TTM) CURLF : $526.37M GTBIF : $574.89M
EBITDA (TTM) CURLF : $217.96M GTBIF : $296.81M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURLF achieves a -15.08% return, which is significantly higher than GTBIF's -20.61% return.

CURLF

• 1D: 13.23%
• 1M: -8.15%
• YTD: -15.08%
• 6M: -23.30%
• 1Y: 135.16%
• 3Y*: -8.68%
• 5Y*: -32.38%
• 10Y*: —

GTBIF

• 1D: 13.93%
• 1M: -3.04%
• YTD: -20.61%
• 6M: -20.15%
• 1Y: 9.81%
• 3Y*: -6.01%
• 5Y*: -26.13%
• 10Y*: 74.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CURLF vs. GTBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURLF

CURLF Risk / Return Rank: 77
CURLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
CURLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CURLF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CURLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CURLF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

GTBIF

GTBIF Risk / Return Rank: 49
GTBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GTBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
GTBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 51
GTBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
GTBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURLF vs. GTBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Green Thumb Industries Inc (GTBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CURLF	GTBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	0.10	+0.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	0.99	+1.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.11	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	0.31	+1.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.80	0.62	+3.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CURLF vs. GTBIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the GTBIF Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURLF and GTBIF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CURLF	GTBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	0.10	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.38	-0.37	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	-0.00	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between CURLF and GTBIF is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CURLF vs. GTBIF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CURLF nor GTBIF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CURLF vs. GTBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURLF drawdown since its inception was -95.70%, roughly equal to the maximum GTBIF drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURLF and GTBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CURLF	GTBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.70%	-99.97%	+4.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.79%	-42.24%	-17.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.16%	-85.71%	-9.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-92.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.49%	-83.41%	-4.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.72%	-78.97%	+21.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.01%	20.77%	+9.24%

Volatility

CURLF vs. GTBIF - Volatility Comparison

Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) has a higher volatility of 22.79% compared to Green Thumb Industries Inc (GTBIF) at 18.42%. This indicates that CURLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTBIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CURLF	GTBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.79%	18.42%	+4.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	83.75%	70.34%	+13.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	124.40%	95.79%	+28.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	85.28%	70.79%	+14.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.15%	46,682.02%	-46,598.87%

Financials

CURLF vs. GTBIF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. and Green Thumb Industries Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CURLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 128.35M and revenue of 338.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.0%.

GTBIF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported a gross profit of 141.34M and revenue of 311.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.4%.

CURLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.96M and revenue of 338.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.

GTBIF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported an operating income of 19.04M and revenue of 311.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

CURLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -60.74M and revenue of 338.19M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.

GTBIF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported a net income of 83.20M and revenue of 311.13M, resulting in a net margin of 26.7%.