PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CURI vs. ESLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CURI vs. ESLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURI achieves a -17.79% return, which is significantly lower than ESLT's 43.79% return.


CURI

1D
-6.73%
1M
-3.79%
YTD
-17.79%
6M
-30.31%
1Y
-51.30%
3Y*
58.97%
5Y*
-21.73%
10Y*

ESLT

1D
-2.28%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
43.79%
6M
73.18%
1Y
97.75%
3Y*
62.84%
5Y*
46.04%
10Y*
25.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURI vs. ESLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CURI
CuriosityStream Inc.
-17.79%170.26%197.97%-52.62%-80.78%-57.49%39.50%
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
43.79%125.14%22.17%31.30%-4.82%34.77%-16.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CURI and ESLT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2020

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CURI:

$179.79M

ESLT:

$39.93B

EPS

CURI:

-$0.14

ESLT:

$12.36

PS Ratio

CURI:

2.46

ESLT:

4.79

PB Ratio

CURI:

4.93

ESLT:

9.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

CURI:

$71.73M

ESLT:

$8.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CURI:

$41.04M

ESLT:

$2.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

CURI:

$2.19M

ESLT:

$861.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CURI vs. ESLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURI
CURI Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CURI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURI Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CURI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURI Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ESLT
ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURI vs. ESLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CURIESLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.76

2.33

-3.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.02

3.25

-4.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.39

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

3.78

-4.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.42

10.98

-12.40

CURI vs. ESLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURI Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the ESLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURI and ESLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CURIESLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.76

2.33

-3.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

1.40

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

0.62

-0.80

Drawdowns

CURI vs. ESLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURI drawdown since its inception was -98.03%, which is greater than ESLT's maximum drawdown of -53.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURI and ESLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CURIESLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.03%

-53.79%

-44.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.67%

-25.98%

-31.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.76%

-25.98%

-33.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.02%

-32.89%

-64.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.39%

-18.10%

-66.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.21%

-13.91%

-55.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.03%

8.94%

+30.09%

Volatility

CURI vs. ESLT - Volatility Comparison

CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI) has a higher volatility of 31.59% compared to Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) at 16.07%. This indicates that CURI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CURIESLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.59%

16.07%

+15.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.70%

33.70%

+11.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.26%

42.24%

+25.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.68%

33.12%

+52.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.14%

29.12%

+52.02%

Dividends

CURI vs. ESLT - Dividend Comparison

CURI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%, more than ESLT's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CURI
CuriosityStream Inc.
13.77%10.00%4.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
0.37%0.47%0.77%0.94%1.22%1.03%1.28%1.14%1.54%1.32%1.57%1.63%

Financials

CURI vs. ESLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CuriosityStream Inc. and Elbit Systems Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
15.16M
2.19B
(CURI) Total Revenue
(ESLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CURI vs. ESLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CuriosityStream Inc. and Elbit Systems Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
56.1%
25.2%
Portfolio components
CURI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CuriosityStream Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.50M and revenue of 15.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.1%.

ESLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

CURI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CuriosityStream Inc. reported an operating income of -1.54M and revenue of 15.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.2%.

ESLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

CURI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CuriosityStream Inc. reported a net income of -1.33M and revenue of 15.16M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.

ESLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CURI and ESLT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CURI has higher volatility (31.59%) compared to ESLT (16.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURI dropped -98.03% vs ESLT's -53.79%.

ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CURI and ESLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer