PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CUKX.L vs. VWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CUKX.L vs. VWRD.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CUKX.L (iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) and VWRD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CUKX.L is a fund fund tracking the FTSE 100 Index, while VWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CUKX.L returned 9.82%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for VWRD.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CUKX.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VWRD.L.

Performance

CUKX.L vs. VWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CUKX.L is traded in GBp, while VWRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VWRD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUKX.L achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than VWRD.L's 10.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CUKX.L has underperformed VWRD.L with an annualized return of 9.82%, while VWRD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.52% annualized return.

CUKX.L

1D
1.55%
1M
1.52%
YTD
7.04%
6M
10.02%
1Y
21.65%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
9.82%

VWRD.L

1D
2.47%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
10.83%
6M
11.63%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
13.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUKX.L vs. VWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CUKX.L
iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF		7.04%25.78%9.30%7.72%4.97%17.48%-11.28%17.23%-9.05%12.45%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF		10.83%13.67%19.71%16.20%-8.46%19.64%12.72%20.89%-4.34%13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CUKX.L and VWRD.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.72

The correlation between CUKX.L and VWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CUKX.L vs. VWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CUKX.L
VWRD.L

Financial Services

25.1%
16.1%

Industrials

14.0%
10.2%

Healthcare

13.5%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

13.0%
4.9%

Energy

10.9%
4.3%

Basic Materials

9.1%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
9.1%

Utilities

5.0%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.6%
8.9%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.6%

Technology

0.8%
30.2%

Financial Services

CUKX.L
25.1%
VWRD.L
16.1%

Industrials

CUKX.L
14.0%
VWRD.L
10.2%

Healthcare

CUKX.L
13.5%
VWRD.L
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

CUKX.L
13.0%
VWRD.L
4.9%

Energy

CUKX.L
10.9%
VWRD.L
4.3%

Basic Materials

CUKX.L
9.1%
VWRD.L
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CUKX.L
5.1%
VWRD.L
9.1%

Utilities

CUKX.L
5.0%
VWRD.L
2.9%

Communication Services

CUKX.L
2.6%
VWRD.L
8.9%

Real Estate

CUKX.L
0.9%
VWRD.L
1.6%

Technology

CUKX.L
0.8%
VWRD.L
30.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF

Often compared with CUKX.L:
CUKX.L vs. VUKG.LCUKX.L vs. IUKD.LCUKX.L vs. FTAL.LCUKX.L vs. CSUK.LCUKX.L vs. VUKE.DECUKX.L vs. S100.LCUKX.L vs. CPJ1.L
Often compared with VWRD.L:
VWRD.L vs. VWRP.LVWRD.L vs. IWDA.LVWRD.L vs. VOOVWRD.L vs. JEPQVWRD.L vs. JEPG.LVWRD.L vs. EGLN.LVWRD.L vs. SPY

Return for Risk

CUKX.L vs. VWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CUKX.L
CUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUKX.L vs. VWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CUKX.LVWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.95
2.26

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.73
3.17

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

3.96

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

14.88

-6.89

CUKX.L vs. VWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUKX.L and VWRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CUKX.L vs. VWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, which is greater than VWRD.L's maximum drawdown of -25.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUKX.L and VWRD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CUKX.LVWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.50%

-25.85%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-6.96%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-18.12%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.88%

-18.12%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.50%

-25.85%

-8.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-1.53%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

-3.40%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

1.86%

+0.84%

Volatility

CUKX.L vs. VWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) is 3.63%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that CUKX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CUKX.LVWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

4.40%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

9.74%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.06%

12.26%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

14.13%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.08%

15.30%

-0.22%

CUKX.L vs. VWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUKX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRD.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CUKX.L vs. VWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

CUKX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUKX.L
iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF		1.25%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

CUKX.L and VWRD.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.

CUKX.L tracks FTSE 100 Index, while VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CUKX.L and 0.22% for VWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUKX.L and VWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer