CUKS.L vs. IUIT.L
CUKS.L (iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CUKS.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Small Cap Ex Invest Trust TR GBP, while IUIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CUKS.L returned 4.74%/yr vs 27.54%/yr for IUIT.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CUKS.L charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIT.L.
Performance
CUKS.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CUKS.L is traded in GBp, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUKS.L achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 26.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CUKS.L has underperformed IUIT.L with an annualized return of 4.74%, while IUIT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.54% annualized return.
CUKS.L
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- 1Y
- 10.62%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 1.23%
- 10Y*
- 4.74%
IUIT.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 16.60%
- YTD
- 26.17%
- 6M
- 24.49%
- 1Y
- 56.60%
- 3Y*
- 31.96%
- 5Y*
- 26.05%
- 10Y*
- 27.54%
CUKS.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUKS.L iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 3.10% | 14.90% | 5.74% | 9.76% | -22.81% | 14.33% | -6.24% | 29.73% | -15.36% | 20.13% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 23.54% | 14.17% | 40.92% | 51.48% | -20.73% | 35.36% | 38.94% | 43.23% | 4.43% | 25.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUKS.L and IUIT.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2015 | 0.44 |
The correlation between CUKS.L and IUIT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CUKS.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
-
Industrials
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
Consumer Cyclical
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
-
Real Estate
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
-
Basic Materials
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
-
Communication Services
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
-
Technology
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
Consumer Defensive
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
-
Energy
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
Healthcare
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
-
Utilities
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUKS.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
CUKS.L
IUIT.L
CUKS.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CUKS.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.46 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 3.32 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | 8.42 | -5.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CUKS.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 2.78 | -1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 1.14 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 1.26 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.24 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
CUKS.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUKS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.42%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUKS.L and IUIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUKS.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.42% | -28.01% | -14.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -16.96% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.88% | -28.01% | +11.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.35% | -28.01% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | -28.01% | -14.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.63% | -0.78% | -2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -5.29% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 6.70% | -2.90% |
Volatility
CUKS.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L) is 4.14%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that CUKS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUKS.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 7.16% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.09% | 15.20% | -4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.40% | 20.23% | -6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 22.82% | -6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 22.51% | -5.49% |
CUKS.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUKS.L has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CUKS.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CUKS.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CUKS.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for CUKS.L.
CUKS.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. CUKS.L tracks FTSE Small Cap Ex Invest Trust TR GBP, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CUKS.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.
Find the right allocation for CUKS.L and IUIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer