CU31.L vs. IB01.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CU31.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L).
CU31.L and IB01.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CU31.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Jun 3, 2009. IB01.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Feb 20, 2019. Both CU31.L and IB01.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CU31.L vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CU31.L vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CU31.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.28% | -1.98% | 5.81% | -1.58% | 7.82% | 0.48% | -0.40% | 2.11% |
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 2.52% | -3.10% | 7.09% | -0.32% | 13.10% | 0.95% | -2.08% | 0.41% |
Different Trading Currencies
CU31.L is traded in GBp, while IB01.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IB01.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CU31.L achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than IB01.L's 2.52% return.
CU31.L
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 0.70%
- 3Y*
- 1.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
IB01.L
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 3.61%
- 1Y
- 1.50%
- 3Y*
- 2.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.15%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CU31.L vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CU31.L and IB01.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CU31.L vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank
CU31.L
IB01.L
CU31.L vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CU31.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CU31.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.10 | 0.21 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.20 | 0.35 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.04 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.32 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 0.60 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CU31.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 0.21 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.49 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.28 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between CU31.L and IB01.L is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CU31.L vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CU31.L nor IB01.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CU31.L vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CU31.L drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, roughly equal to the maximum IB01.L drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU31.L and IB01.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CU31.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -0.91% | -17.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.51% | -0.09% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.29% | -0.29% | -16.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.04% | 0.00% | -7.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -0.08% | -8.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 0.01% | +3.56% |
Volatility
CU31.L vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CU31.L) is 2.04%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that CU31.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CU31.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 2.57% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.33% | 4.81% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.71% | 7.24% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.06% | 8.47% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 8.86% | +0.36% |