PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CU2U.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CU2U.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CU2U.L is traded in USD, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


CU2U.L

1D
0.43%
1M
6.87%
YTD
12.35%
6M
13.81%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
14.45%

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CU2U.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CU2U.L
Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD
12.35%14.10%19.50%27.09%-20.03%27.37%20.45%31.60%-6.43%11.96%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.64%23.69%-18.69%22.97%15.27%28.71%-9.87%10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CU2U.L and MWRD.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.74

The correlation between CU2U.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CU2U.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CU2U.L
MWRD.L

Technology

29.4%
24.7%

Healthcare

13.0%
12.4%

Financial Services

11.7%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
10.5%

Communication Services

8.8%
7.5%

Industrials

8.4%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
6.7%

Energy

4.4%
4.4%

Real Estate

2.5%
2.4%

Utilities

2.3%
2.4%

Basic Materials

2.3%
3.8%

Technology

CU2U.L
29.4%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Healthcare

CU2U.L
13.0%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Financial Services

CU2U.L
11.7%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CU2U.L
11.0%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Communication Services

CU2U.L
8.8%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Industrials

CU2U.L
8.4%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

CU2U.L
6.3%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Energy

CU2U.L
4.4%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Real Estate

CU2U.L
2.5%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Utilities

CU2U.L
2.3%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Basic Materials

CU2U.L
2.3%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CU2U.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CU2U.L
CU2U.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CU2U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CU2U.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CU2U.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.91

CU2U.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CU2U.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

Drawdowns

CU2U.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CU2U.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

Volatility

CU2U.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CU2U.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

CU2U.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CU2U.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CU2U.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CU2U.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CU2U.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CU2U.L.

CU2U.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. CU2U.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CU2U.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CU2U.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer