PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTY.L vs. IUVF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTY.L vs. IUVF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in The City of London Investment Trust plc (CTY.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTY.L achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly lower than IUVF.L's 38.84% return.


CTY.L

1D
1.22%
1M
2.46%
6M
8.14%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
8.84%

IUVF.L

1D
-0.55%
1M
-5.43%
6M
31.08%
YTD
38.84%
1Y
72.28%
3Y*
27.66%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTY.L vs. IUVF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTY.L
The City of London Investment Trust plc
12.44%28.15%10.62%4.83%9.40%11.77%-11.85%20.50%-8.47%12.55%
IUVF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS
38.84%23.92%8.23%8.28%-4.63%31.29%-4.75%22.11%-7.17%10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CTY.L and IUVF.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2016

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between CTY.L and IUVF.L has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTY.L vs. IUVF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTY.L
CTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

IUVF.L
IUVF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IUVF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTY.L vs. IUVF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The City of London Investment Trust plc (CTY.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTY.LIUVF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.71

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

8.41

-6.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

33.92

-26.10

CTY.L vs. IUVF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the IUVF.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTY.L and IUVF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTY.L vs. IUVF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTY.L drawdown since its inception was -44.92%, which is greater than IUVF.L's maximum drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTY.L and IUVF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTY.LIUVF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.92%

-31.83%

-13.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-8.55%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.05%

-20.13%

+10.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.40%

-20.13%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.55%

+8.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-5.50%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.12%

+0.85%

Volatility

CTY.L vs. IUVF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The City of London Investment Trust plc (CTY.L) is 3.26%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) has a volatility of 8.01%. This indicates that CTY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUVF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTY.LIUVF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

8.01%

-4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

15.11%

-3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.11%

17.60%

-4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.61%

16.42%

-2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

18.07%

-2.58%

Dividends

CTY.L vs. IUVF.L - Dividend Comparison

CTY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, while IUVF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTY.L
The City of London Investment Trust plc
3.75%4.06%4.82%4.92%4.82%4.86%5.07%4.22%4.66%3.86%1.00%3.99%
IUVF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTY.L and IUVF.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTY.L and IUVF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer