CTWO vs. DCMT
CTWO (COtwo Advisors Physical European Carbon Allowance Trust) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both Commodities funds. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTWO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.
Performance
CTWO vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTWO achieves a -15.24% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 34.49% return.
CTWO
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- -15.24%
- 6M
- -10.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DCMT
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- 34.49%
- 6M
- 33.53%
- 1Y
- 42.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTWO vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTWO COtwo Advisors Physical European Carbon Allowance Trust | -15.24% | 15.78% |
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 34.49% | -0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTWO and DCMT is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTWO vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank
CTWO
DCMT
CTWO vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COtwo Advisors Physical European Carbon Allowance Trust (CTWO) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTWO | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 1.20 | -1.28 |
Drawdowns
CTWO vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTWO drawdown since its inception was -30.13%, which is greater than DCMT's maximum drawdown of -11.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTWO and DCMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTWO | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.13% | -11.95% | -18.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.89% | -3.46% | -21.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.19% | -3.13% | -6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.59% | — |
Volatility
CTWO vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTWO | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.94% | 18.27% | +9.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.94% | 15.77% | +12.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.94% | 15.77% | +12.17% |
CTWO vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTWO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTWO vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison
CTWO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CTWO COtwo Advisors Physical European Carbon Allowance Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.73% | 3.67% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTWO and DCMT have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DCMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DCMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CTWO.
DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.00% for CTWO.
They also come from different issuers: COtwo Advisors and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CTWO and 0.66% for DCMT.
Find the right allocation for CTWO and DCMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer