CTSIX vs. CMCIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX).

CTSIX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Mar 23, 2011. CMCIX is an actively managed fund by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Jul 29, 2011.

Performance

CTSIX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CTSIX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	-4.77%	25.90%	44.34%	5.57%
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I	-4.71%	-5.28%	10.46%	7.81%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CTSIX having a -4.77% return and CMCIX slightly higher at -4.71%.

CTSIX

• 1D: -3.92%
• 1M: -9.84%
• YTD: -4.77%
• 6M: -1.18%
• 1Y: 36.02%
• 3Y*: 20.88%
• 5Y*: 2.96%
• 10Y*: —

CMCIX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -8.88%
• YTD: -4.71%
• 6M: -7.29%
• 1Y: -5.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTSIX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTSIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.

CMCIX

Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I

CTSIX

Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund

Return for Risk

CTSIX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTSIX

CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 79
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

CMCIX

CMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
CMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTSIX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTSIX	CMCIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	-0.29	+1.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	-0.30	+2.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.96	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	-0.54	+3.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.72	-1.39	+12.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTSIX vs. CMCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the CMCIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTSIX and CMCIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTSIX	CMCIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	-0.29	+1.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.18	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between CTSIX and CMCIX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CTSIX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison

CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.77%	4.95%
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I	4.46%	4.25%	7.13%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CTSIX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTSIX drawdown since its inception was -50.83%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTSIX and CMCIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTSIX	CMCIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.83%	-21.50%	-29.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.38%	-12.55%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.38%	-16.43%	+4.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.13%	-6.16%	-14.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	4.90%	-1.70%

Volatility

CTSIX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a higher volatility of 12.38% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 4.68%. This indicates that CTSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTSIX	CMCIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.38%	4.68%	+7.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.14%	10.54%	+10.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.23%	19.19%	+10.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.79%	16.61%	+11.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.69%	16.61%	+13.08%