PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTRIX vs. NPCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CTRIX vs. NPCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CTRIX vs. NPCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CTRIX
Calamos Total Return Bond Fund
-0.63%7.31%1.49%4.78%-12.91%1.15%
NPCT
Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund
3.03%9.87%17.23%7.78%-37.50%-4.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTRIX achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than NPCT's 3.03% return.


CTRIX

1D
0.45%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
0.38%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
1.59%

NPCT

1D
3.35%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
3.03%
6M
-1.87%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CTRIX vs. NPCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTRIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than NPCT's 5.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CTRIX vs. NPCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTRIX
CTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

NPCT
NPCT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NPCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPCT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NPCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPCT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTRIX vs. NPCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTRIXNPCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

0.64

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

0.99

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.13

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.02

+0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.48

2.56

+2.92

CTRIX vs. NPCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the NPCT Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTRIX and NPCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTRIXNPCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

0.64

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

-0.25

+0.75

Correlation

The correlation between CTRIX and NPCT is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CTRIX vs. NPCT - Dividend Comparison

CTRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than NPCT's 12.55% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTRIX
Calamos Total Return Bond Fund
3.60%3.90%3.63%2.61%2.71%3.46%2.42%2.79%2.89%3.29%2.76%4.68%
NPCT
Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund
12.55%13.15%12.20%10.28%11.93%3.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CTRIX vs. NPCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTRIX drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, smaller than the maximum NPCT drawdown of -46.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTRIX and NPCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CTRIXNPCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.84%

-46.77%

+28.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-7.30%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-16.35%

+13.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-25.61%

+22.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

2.90%

-2.00%

Volatility

CTRIX vs. NPCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX) is 1.64%, while Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that CTRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CTRIXNPCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

4.90%

-3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

6.53%

-4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

11.93%

-7.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.51%

13.15%

-7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.57%

13.15%

-8.58%