PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTRIX vs. CTSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTRIX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTRIX achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 18.97% return.


CTRIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.44%
6M
-1.26%
YTD
-1.19%
1Y
1.32%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
1.27%
ALL TIME*
2.02%

CTSIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
-9.89%
6M
18.17%
YTD
18.97%
1Y
39.64%
3Y*
27.12%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CTRIX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CTRIX
Calamos Total Return Bond Fund
-1.19%7.31%1.49%4.78%-12.91%-1.27%6.97%3.18%
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
18.97%25.90%44.34%7.57%-37.30%9.12%63.38%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CTRIX and CTSIX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2019

0.10

The correlation between CTRIX and CTSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTRIX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CTRIX
CTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

CTSIX
CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CTRIX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTRIXCTSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.22

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

2.08

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

8.64

-6.75

CTRIX vs. CTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTRIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the CTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTRIX and CTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTRIX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTRIX drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, smaller than the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTRIX and CTSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTRIXCTSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.84%

-50.83%

+32.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-17.99%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.35%

-28.40%

+23.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.76%

-50.60%

+32.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

-15.14%

+11.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.03%

-20.30%

+17.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

4.33%

-3.21%

Volatility

CTRIX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX) is 0.89%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that CTRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTRIXCTSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

10.46%

-9.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

25.51%

-22.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

30.95%

-27.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.55%

28.60%

-23.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

30.01%

-25.41%

CTRIX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTRIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTRIX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

CTRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTRIX
Calamos Total Return Bond Fund
3.27%3.90%3.63%2.61%2.71%3.46%2.42%2.79%2.89%3.29%2.76%4.68%
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%2.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.77%4.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTRIX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTSIX has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to CTRIX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTRIX dropped -17.84% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.

CTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTRIX and CTSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer