CTIGX vs. CHYDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) and Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX).
CTIGX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Jul 31, 2019. CHYDX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Aug 2, 1999.
Performance
CTIGX vs. CHYDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CTIGX vs. CHYDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 0.46% | 21.21% | 44.09% | 12.26% | -34.88% | 7.64% | 58.94% | -3.80% |
CHYDX Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund | -0.47% | 6.72% | 7.78% | 12.26% | -10.35% | 6.44% | 4.78% | 3.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTIGX achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than CHYDX's -0.47% return.
CTIGX
- 1D
- 5.87%
- 1M
- -6.37%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 39.29%
- 3Y*
- 23.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- —
CHYDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 5.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CTIGX vs. CHYDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTIGX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CHYDX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CTIGX vs. CHYDX — Risk / Return Rank
CTIGX
CHYDX
CTIGX vs. CHYDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) and Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTIGX | CHYDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.81 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.93 | 2.50 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.43 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 1.84 | +1.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 8.54 | +4.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTIGX | CHYDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.81 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.91 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.04 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between CTIGX and CHYDX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CTIGX vs. CHYDX - Dividend Comparison
CTIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than CHYDX's 5.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 4.57% | 4.59% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHYDX Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund | 5.74% | 6.39% | 6.30% | 6.28% | 5.47% | 4.48% | 5.26% | 5.85% | 6.62% | 4.87% | 4.94% | 5.43% |
Drawdowns
CTIGX vs. CHYDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTIGX drawdown since its inception was -46.26%, which is greater than CHYDX's maximum drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIGX and CHYDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTIGX | CHYDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.26% | -35.03% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -2.85% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.26% | -13.66% | -32.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.37% | -1.60% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.05% | -2.78% | -16.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 0.61% | +2.60% |
Volatility
CTIGX vs. CHYDX - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a higher volatility of 12.85% compared to Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) at 1.04%. This indicates that CTIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHYDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CTIGX | CHYDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.85% | 1.04% | +11.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.84% | 1.60% | +19.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.76% | 3.00% | +25.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 4.05% | +22.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.11% | 4.96% | +24.15% |