PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTEN.DE vs. ETHA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTEN.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) and 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEN.DE achieves a -30.10% return, which is significantly higher than ETHA.DE's -39.59% return.


CTEN.DE

1D
-1.29%
1M
-17.15%
YTD
-30.10%
6M
-36.14%
1Y
-36.76%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
10Y*

ETHA.DE

1D
-3.89%
1M
-25.02%
YTD
-39.59%
6M
-44.22%
1Y
-34.16%
3Y*
-4.07%
5Y*
-6.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEN.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CTEN.DE
CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP
-30.10%-19.43%96.51%53.65%
ETHA.DE
21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP
-39.59%-22.34%52.23%34.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEN.DE and ETHA.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023

0.92

The correlation between CTEN.DE and ETHA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTEN.DE vs. ETHA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEN.DE
CTEN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CTEN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHA.DE
ETHA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEN.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) and 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTEN.DEETHA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.94

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

-0.55

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

-0.94

-0.16

CTEN.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEN.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the ETHA.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEN.DE and ETHA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTEN.DEETHA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.76

-0.57

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

-0.01

+0.36

Drawdowns

CTEN.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.27%, smaller than the maximum ETHA.DE drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEN.DE and ETHA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTEN.DEETHA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.27%

-76.82%

+20.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.27%

-61.72%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.27%

-64.71%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.40%

-64.41%

+9.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-43.74%

+24.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.71%

36.35%

-2.64%

Volatility

CTEN.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) and 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHA.DE) have volatilities of 9.77% and 10.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTEN.DEETHA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.77%

10.14%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.00%

42.04%

-7.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.20%

59.62%

-10.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.10%

67.07%

-14.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.10%

69.50%

-17.40%

CTEN.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEN.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHA.DE's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTEN.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CTEN.DE nor ETHA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, CTEN.DE and ETHA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CTEN.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTEN.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for ETHA.DE.

They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and 21Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CTEN.DE and 1.49% for ETHA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTEN.DE and ETHA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer