PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTEN.DE vs. BABO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTEN.DE vs. BABO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CTEN.DE is traded in EUR, while BABO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BABO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEN.DE achieves a -30.10% return, which is significantly lower than BABO's -12.04% return.


CTEN.DE

1D
-1.29%
1M
-17.15%
YTD
-30.10%
6M
-36.14%
1Y
-36.76%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
10Y*

BABO

1D
-0.77%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
-12.04%
6M
-17.09%
1Y
3.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEN.DE vs. BABO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CTEN.DE
CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP
-30.10%-19.43%70.96%
BABO
YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF
-12.04%29.41%5.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEN.DE and BABO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTEN.DE vs. BABO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEN.DE
CTEN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CTEN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BABO
BABO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BABO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BABO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEN.DE vs. BABO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTEN.DEBABODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.05

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

0.11

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

0.21

-1.31

CTEN.DE vs. BABO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEN.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the BABO Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEN.DE and BABO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTEN.DEBABODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.76

0.09

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.29

+0.06

Drawdowns

CTEN.DE vs. BABO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.27%, which is greater than BABO's maximum drawdown of -31.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEN.DE and BABO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTEN.DEBABODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.27%

-31.93%

-24.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.27%

-28.63%

-27.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.40%

-26.27%

-29.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-14.56%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.71%

14.39%

+19.32%

Volatility

CTEN.DE vs. BABO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) is 9.77%, while YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) has a volatility of 11.72%. This indicates that CTEN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTEN.DEBABODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.77%

11.72%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.00%

23.97%

+11.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.20%

35.13%

+14.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.10%

36.57%

+15.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.10%

36.57%

+15.53%

CTEN.DE vs. BABO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEN.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BABO's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTEN.DE vs. BABO - Dividend Comparison

CTEN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.11%.


PositionTTM20252024
BABO
YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF
88.11%85.50%20.65%
CTEN.DE
CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTEN.DE and BABO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTEN.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTEN.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABO.

CTEN.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BABO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CTEN.DE and 0.99% for BABO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTEN.DE and BABO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer