CTEF vs. SRHQ
CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) and SRHQ (SRH U.S. Quality ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. CTEF is actively managed, while SRHQ is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CTEF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SRHQ.
Performance
CTEF vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTEF achieves a 29.35% return, which is significantly higher than SRHQ's 11.72% return.
CTEF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 29.35%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRHQ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTEF vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 29.35% | 33.22% |
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF | 11.72% | 10.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEF and SRHQ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTEF vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank
CTEF
SRHQ
CTEF vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTEF | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.54 | 1.06 | +2.48 |
Drawdowns
CTEF vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEF drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, smaller than the maximum SRHQ drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEF and SRHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEF | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.00% | -18.50% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -1.72% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -3.08% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility
CTEF vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTEF | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.81% | 14.75% | +7.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 16.03% | +5.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 16.03% | +5.78% |
CTEF vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTEF vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison
CTEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than SRHQ's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.84% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTEF and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SRHQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SRHQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.
SRHQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: Castellan and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTEF and 0.35% for SRHQ.
Find the right allocation for CTEF and SRHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer