PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTEF vs. OPTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTEF vs. OPTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEF achieves a 36.91% return, which is significantly higher than OPTZ's 32.54% return.


CTEF

1D
-2.45%
1M
13.53%
YTD
36.91%
6M
33.85%
1Y
81.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OPTZ

1D
-3.23%
1M
7.00%
YTD
32.54%
6M
30.49%
1Y
61.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEF vs. OPTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
36.91%33.10%
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
32.54%22.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEF and OPTZ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.81

The correlation between CTEF and OPTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTEF vs. OPTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEF
CTEF Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CTEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEF Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEF Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

OPTZ
OPTZ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
OPTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
OPTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEF vs. OPTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTEFOPTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.52

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.43

5.78

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.12

25.39

-0.26

CTEF vs. OPTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEF Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is comparable to the OPTZ Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEF and OPTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTEF vs. OPTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEF drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, smaller than the maximum OPTZ drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEF and OPTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTEFOPTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.00%

-25.75%

+10.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.00%

-10.63%

-4.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-3.23%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-3.36%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

2.42%

+0.82%

Volatility

CTEF vs. OPTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) is 9.15%, while Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a volatility of 9.74%. This indicates that CTEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTEFOPTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.15%

9.74%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.03%

16.08%

+2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.64%

19.88%

+2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

21.28%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.56%

21.28%

+1.28%

CTEF vs. OPTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than OPTZ's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTEF vs. OPTZ - Dividend Comparison

CTEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than OPTZ's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
0.06%0.08%0.00%
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
0.44%0.58%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTEF and OPTZ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPTZ has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to CTEF (9.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEF dropped -15.00% vs OPTZ's -25.75%.

On 1-year performance, CTEF leads with 81.04% vs 61.16% for OPTZ. On fees, OPTZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CTEF has been the lower-risk option at 9.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CTEF has performed better with a 81.04% return vs 61.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OPTZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.

OPTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.

They also come from different issuers: Castellan and Optimize. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTEF and 0.25% for OPTZ.

CTEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTEF and OPTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer