CTEF vs. FMTM

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Castellan, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CTEF returned 64.32% vs 42.90% for FMTM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.

Performance

CTEF vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEF achieves a 33.21% return, which is significantly higher than FMTM's 18.34% return.

CTEF

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -4.17%
• 6M: 28.28%
• YTD: 33.21%
• 1Y: 64.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 69.37%

FMTM

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -10.52%
• 6M: 8.31%
• YTD: 18.34%
• 1Y: 42.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 36.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEF vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	33.21%	33.10%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	18.34%	24.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEF and FMTM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.83

The correlation between CTEF and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CTEF vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEF

CTEF Risk / Return Rank: 93
CTEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CTEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CTEF Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CTEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CTEF Martin Ratio Rank: 94

FMTM

FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 71
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEF vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTEF	FMTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	1.65	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	2.16	+1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.28	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.31	3.35	+0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.08	11.46	+7.62

CTEF vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEF and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CTEF vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEF drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEF and FMTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEF	FMTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.00%	-12.86%	-2.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.00%	-12.86%	-2.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.75%	-12.86%	+7.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-2.16%	+0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	3.75%	-0.37%

Volatility

CTEF vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) is 6.70%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that CTEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTEF	FMTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.70%	11.12%	-4.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.32%	20.71%	-1.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.21%	26.12%	-2.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.50%	24.62%	-2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.50%	24.62%	-2.12%

CTEF vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CTEF and FMTM have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

Dividends

CTEF vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

CTEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than FMTM's 0.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	0.06%	0.08%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	0.25%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTEF and FMTM in my portfolio?

CTEF and FMTM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTEF or FMTM?

FMTM has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to CTEF (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEF dropped -15.00% vs FMTM's -12.86%.

Which ETF is better, CTEF or FMTM?

On 1-year performance, CTEF leads with 64.32% vs 42.90% for FMTM. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, CTEF has been the lower-risk option at 6.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CTEF or FMTM?

Over the 1-year period, CTEF has performed better with a 64.32% return vs 42.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTEF or FMTM?

CTEF and FMTM have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTEF or FMTM?

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.

What is the main difference between CTEF and FMTM?

CTEF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FMTM is Momentum.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.