CTEC vs. HJEN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) and Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN).

CTEC and HJEN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CTEC is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global CleanTech Index. It was launched on Oct 27, 2020. HJEN is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Indxx Hydrogen Economy Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Mar 25, 2021. Both CTEC and HJEN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CTEC vs. HJEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) and Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CTEC vs. HJEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF	9.83%	57.85%	-36.35%	-25.60%	-16.82%	-13.04%
HJEN Direxion Hydrogen ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-10.90%	-8.69%	-33.27%	-13.86%

Returns By Period

CTEC

• 1D: 5.37%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: 9.83%
• 6M: 16.68%
• 1Y: 96.37%
• 3Y*: -9.00%
• 5Y*: -11.44%
• 10Y*: —

HJEN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEC vs. HJEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HJEN's 0.45% expense ratio.

CTEC

Global X CleanTech ETF

HJEN

Direxion Hydrogen ETF

Return for Risk

CTEC vs. HJEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEC

CTEC Risk / Return Rank: 95
CTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEC vs. HJEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) and Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTEC	HJEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.18	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.22	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTEC	HJEN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between CTEC and HJEN is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CTEC vs. HJEN - Dividend Comparison

CTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while HJEN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF	0.68%	0.75%	1.56%	0.51%	0.25%	0.39%	0.02%
HJEN Direxion Hydrogen ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.91%	1.50%	1.24%	0.76%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEC	HJEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.34%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.42%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTEC	HJEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.43%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.93%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.90%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.54%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.92%	—	—