CTAS vs. TDG
CTAS (Cintas Corporation) and TDG (TransDigm Group Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — CTAS in Specialty Business Services, TDG in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 10 years, CTAS returned 23.37%/yr vs 22.15%/yr for TDG. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CTAS vs. TDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTAS achieves a -7.21% return, which is significantly higher than TDG's -9.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CTAS has outperformed TDG with an annualized return of 23.37%, while TDG has yielded a comparatively lower 22.15% annualized return.
CTAS
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -4.62%
- 1Y
- -23.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 15.90%
- 10Y*
- 23.37%
TDG
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- -12.05%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 16.93%
- 10Y*
- 22.15%
CTAS vs. TDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS Cintas Corporation | -7.21% | 3.78% | 22.24% | 34.82% | 2.97% | 26.51% | 32.74% | 61.73% | 9.04% | 36.32% |
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | -9.29% | 12.15% | 32.27% | 66.57% | 1.77% | 2.82% | 10.51% | 84.41% | 23.83% | 19.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTAS and TDG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2006 | 0.47 |
The correlation between CTAS and TDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CTAS:
$70.65B
TDG:
$70.21B
CTAS:
$4.75
TDG:
$34.79
CTAS:
36.53
TDG:
34.67
CTAS:
2.56
TDG:
1.03
CTAS:
6.42
TDG:
7.38
CTAS:
$11.03B
TDG:
$9.50B
CTAS:
$1.33B
TDG:
$5.61B
CTAS:
$2.66B
TDG:
$4.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTAS vs. TDG — Risk / Return Rank
CTAS
TDG
CTAS vs. TDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTAS | TDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.94 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.48 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | -0.83 | -0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTAS | TDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.16 | -0.44 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.61 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.66 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.85 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
CTAS vs. TDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTAS drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, roughly equal to the maximum TDG drawdown of -62.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAS and TDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTAS | TDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -62.64% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.23% | -25.30% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | -25.30% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | -25.30% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.38% | -62.64% | +14.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.00% | -20.46% | -2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.04% | -7.95% | -7.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.88% | 14.58% | +1.30% |
Volatility
CTAS vs. TDG - Volatility Comparison
Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) have volatilities of 7.66% and 7.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTAS | TDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | 7.72% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.25% | 21.00% | -5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.92% | 27.63% | -7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 27.81% | -5.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.67% | 33.78% | -7.11% |
Dividends
CTAS vs. TDG - Dividend Comparison
CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than TDG's 7.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 1.04% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | 7.46% | 6.77% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.16% | 0.00% | 8.01% | 9.64% | 0.00% |
Financials
CTAS vs. TDG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cintas Corporation and TransDigm Group Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CTAS vs. TDG - Profitability Comparison
CTAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.
TDG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
CTAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.
TDG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
CTAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
TDG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported a net income of 535.00M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CTAS and TDG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDG has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to CTAS (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTAS dropped -65.32% vs TDG's -62.64%.
TDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTAS and TDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer