CTAS vs. SGOV
CTAS (Cintas Corporation) is a stock, while SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Over the past 5 years, CTAS returned 15.76%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for SGOV. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CTAS vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTAS achieves a -6.63% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.51% return.
CTAS
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- -6.63%
- 6M
- -4.93%
- 1Y
- -22.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.76%
- 10Y*
- 23.39%
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- —
CTAS vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS Cintas Corporation | -6.63% | 3.78% | 22.24% | 34.82% | 2.97% | 26.51% | 41.89% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 1.51% | 4.24% | 5.27% | 5.12% | 1.58% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTAS and SGOV is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2020 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTAS vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
CTAS
SGOV
CTAS vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTAS | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -21.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -277.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 195.55 | -194.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 398.20 | -399.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 4,462.00 | -4,463.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTAS | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.17 | 20.28 | -21.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 14.73 | -14.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 12.48 | -11.96 |
Drawdowns
CTAS vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTAS drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAS and SGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTAS | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -0.03% | -65.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.68% | -0.01% | -27.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | -0.01% | -27.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | -0.03% | -27.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.53% | 0.00% | -22.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.04% | -0.00% | -15.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.71% | 0.00% | +15.71% |
Volatility
CTAS vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
Cintas Corporation (CTAS) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that CTAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTAS | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | 0.05% | +6.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.56% | 0.13% | +14.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.36% | 0.20% | +19.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 0.24% | +22.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 0.24% | +26.39% |
Dividends
CTAS vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SGOV's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 1.03% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.86% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTAS and SGOV have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTAS has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTAS dropped -65.32% vs SGOV's -0.03%.
SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTAS and SGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer