CSYZ.DE vs. R8T.DE
CSYZ.DE (CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD) and R8T.DE (abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds. CSYZ.DE is passively managed, while R8T.DE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSYZ.DE returned 3.23%/yr vs 3.46%/yr for R8T.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSYZ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for R8T.DE.
Performance
CSYZ.DE vs. R8T.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSYZ.DE achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly higher than R8T.DE's 5.83% return.
CSYZ.DE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 7.36%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 3.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- —
R8T.DE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 6.12%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSYZ.DE vs. R8T.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD | 7.36% | -5.02% | 2.47% | 2.13% |
R8T.DE abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 5.83% | -3.97% | 2.59% | 5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSYZ.DE and R8T.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between CSYZ.DE and R8T.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSYZ.DE vs. R8T.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSYZ.DE
R8T.DE
CSYZ.DE vs. R8T.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSYZ.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.11 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.32 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 0.55 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSYZ.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.24 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.16 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
CSYZ.DE vs. R8T.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSYZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, which is greater than R8T.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSYZ.DE and R8T.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSYZ.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -21.76% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | -18.35% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -21.76% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.10% | -11.79% | -3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.84% | -7.54% | -6.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 10.72% | -7.90% |
Volatility
CSYZ.DE vs. R8T.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) is 2.84%, while abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that CSYZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than R8T.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSYZ.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 2.99% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.54% | 9.05% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.29% | 24.56% | -13.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 18.55% | -3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 18.55% | -3.33% |
CSYZ.DE vs. R8T.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSYZ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than R8T.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSYZ.DE vs. R8T.DE - Dividend Comparison
CSYZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while R8T.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD | 1.01% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 3.39% | 0.21% |
R8T.DE abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, CSYZ.DE and R8T.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CSYZ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSYZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for R8T.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CSYZ.DE and 0.40% for R8T.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSYZ.DE and R8T.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer