CSYZ.DE vs. CSYU.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSYZ.DE (CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD) and CSYU.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD) are both exchange-traded funds - CSYZ.DE is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green, while CSYU.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSYZ.DE returned 3.23%/yr vs 26.43%/yr for CSYU.DE. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSYZ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CSYU.DE.

Performance

CSYZ.DE vs. CSYU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSYZ.DE achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly lower than CSYU.DE's 14.12% return.

CSYZ.DE

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 7.36%
• 6M: 6.96%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: 0.05%
• 10Y*: —

CSYU.DE

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 7.71%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 6M: 12.92%
• 1Y: 33.64%
• 3Y*: 26.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSYZ.DE vs. CSYU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD	7.36%	-5.02%	2.47%	4.08%	-14.45%
CSYU.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD	14.12%	7.11%	49.10%	48.18%	-20.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CSYZ.DE and CSYU.DE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2022	0.37

The correlation between CSYZ.DE and CSYU.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CSYZ.DE vs. CSYU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSYZ.DE

CSYZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 19
CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CSYZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CSYZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CSYZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CSYZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

CSYU.DE

CSYU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 50
CSYU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
CSYU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CSYU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CSYU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CSYU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSYZ.DE vs. CSYU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSYZ.DE	CSYU.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	1.93	-1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	2.57	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.33	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	2.28	-1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.28	6.17	-3.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSYZ.DE vs. CSYU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the CSYU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSYZ.DE and CSYU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSYZ.DE	CSYU.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57	1.93	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.90	-0.64

Drawdowns

CSYZ.DE vs. CSYU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSYZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, which is greater than CSYU.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSYZ.DE and CSYU.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSYZ.DE	CSYU.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.21%	-28.65%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.07%	-14.66%	+6.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.14%	-28.65%	+8.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.10%	-2.31%	-12.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.84%	-7.55%	-6.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	5.44%	-2.62%

Volatility

CSYZ.DE vs. CSYU.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) is 2.84%, while CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that CSYZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSYU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSYZ.DE	CSYU.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	5.08%	-2.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.54%	11.70%	-3.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.29%	17.33%	-6.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.03%	21.80%	-6.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.22%	21.80%	-6.58%

CSYZ.DE vs. CSYU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSYZ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSYU.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CSYZ.DE vs. CSYU.DE - Dividend Comparison

CSYZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while CSYU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CSYU.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD	1.01%	1.32%	0.00%	0.76%	3.39%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSYZ.DE and CSYU.DE in my portfolio?

CSYZ.DE and CSYU.DE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSYZ.DE or CSYU.DE?

On fees, CSYU.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSYZ.DE or CSYU.DE?

CSYU.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CSYZ.DE.

What is the main difference between CSYZ.DE and CSYU.DE?

CSYZ.DE is categorized as REIT, while CSYU.DE is Technology Equities. CSYZ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green, while CSYU.DE tracks MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CSYZ.DE and 0.18% for CSYU.DE.