CSYU.DE vs. CSYZ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSYU.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD) and CSYZ.DE (CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD) are both exchange-traded funds - CSYU.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal, while CSYZ.DE is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSYU.DE returned 26.43%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for CSYZ.DE. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSYU.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CSYZ.DE.

Performance

CSYU.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSYU.DE achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than CSYZ.DE's 7.36% return.

CSYU.DE

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 7.71%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 6M: 12.92%
• 1Y: 33.64%
• 3Y*: 26.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSYZ.DE

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 7.36%
• 6M: 6.96%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: 0.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSYU.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSYU.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD	14.12%	7.11%	49.10%	48.18%	-20.13%
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD	7.36%	-5.02%	2.47%	4.08%	-14.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CSYU.DE and CSYZ.DE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2022	0.37

The correlation between CSYU.DE and CSYZ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CSYU.DE vs. CSYZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSYU.DE

CSYU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 50
CSYU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
CSYU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CSYU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CSYU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CSYU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CSYZ.DE

CSYZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 19
CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CSYZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CSYZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CSYZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CSYZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSYU.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSYU.DE	CSYZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	0.57	+1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	0.87	+1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.10	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	0.80	+1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.17	2.28	+3.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSYU.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSYU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSYU.DE and CSYZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSYU.DE	CSYZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	0.57	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.26	+0.64

Drawdowns

CSYU.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSYU.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, smaller than the maximum CSYZ.DE drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSYU.DE and CSYZ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSYU.DE	CSYZ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.65%	-31.21%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.66%	-8.07%	-6.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.65%	-20.14%	-8.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.31%	-15.10%	+12.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-13.84%	+6.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.44%	2.82%	+2.62%

Volatility

CSYU.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) at 2.84%. This indicates that CSYU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSYZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSYU.DE	CSYZ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	2.84%	+2.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.70%	8.54%	+3.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.33%	11.29%	+6.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.80%	15.03%	+6.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.80%	15.22%	+6.58%

CSYU.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSYU.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CSYZ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CSYU.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

CSYU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSYZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CSYU.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD	1.01%	1.32%	0.00%	0.76%	3.39%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSYU.DE and CSYZ.DE in my portfolio?

CSYU.DE and CSYZ.DE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSYU.DE or CSYZ.DE?

On fees, CSYU.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSYU.DE or CSYZ.DE?

CSYU.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CSYZ.DE.

What is the main difference between CSYU.DE and CSYZ.DE?

CSYU.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while CSYZ.DE is REIT. CSYU.DE tracks MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal, while CSYZ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CSYU.DE and 0.25% for CSYZ.DE.