PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSYU.DE vs. CSY9.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSYU.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSYU.DE achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's 3.19% return.


CSYU.DE

1D
-1.32%
1M
7.71%
YTD
14.12%
6M
12.92%
1Y
33.64%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
10Y*

CSY9.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
2.99%
YTD
3.19%
6M
3.34%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
6.65%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSYU.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CSYU.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD
14.12%7.11%49.10%48.18%-20.13%
CSY9.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD
3.19%-0.67%16.05%5.76%1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CSYU.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2022

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between CSYU.DE and CSY9.DE has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSYU.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSYU.DE
CSYU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CSYU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSYU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSYU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CSYU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSYU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CSY9.DE
CSY9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSYU.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSYU.DECSY9.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.07

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

0.69

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

1.54

+4.62

CSYU.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSYU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSYU.DE and CSY9.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSYU.DECSY9.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

0.38

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.61

+0.29

Drawdowns

CSYU.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSYU.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, which is greater than CSY9.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSYU.DE and CSY9.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSYU.DECSY9.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.65%

-13.92%

-14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.66%

-4.48%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-13.92%

-14.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-2.72%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-3.70%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.44%

2.00%

+3.44%

Volatility

CSYU.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison

CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 2.09%. This indicates that CSYU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSYU.DECSY9.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

2.09%

+2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

5.48%

+6.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.33%

8.07%

+9.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.80%

12.03%

+9.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.80%

11.91%

+9.89%

CSYU.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSYU.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CSY9.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSYU.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSYU.DE nor CSY9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CSYU.DE and CSY9.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSYU.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSYU.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CSY9.DE.

CSYU.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while CSY9.DE is Global Equities. CSYU.DE tracks MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal, while CSY9.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CSYU.DE and 0.25% for CSY9.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSYU.DE and CSY9.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer