CSY9.DE vs. ASCH.DE
CSY9.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD) and ASCH.DE (abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CSY9.DE is passively managed, while ASCH.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, CSY9.DE returned 3.09% vs 47.98% for ASCH.DE. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSY9.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ASCH.DE.
Performance
CSY9.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSY9.DE achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly lower than ASCH.DE's 28.67% return.
CSY9.DE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 3.34%
- 1Y
- 3.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- —
ASCH.DE
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 7.87%
- YTD
- 28.67%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 47.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSY9.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSY9.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 3.19% | -0.35% |
ASCH.DE abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF | 28.67% | 17.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSY9.DE and ASCH.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSY9.DE vs. ASCH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSY9.DE
ASCH.DE
CSY9.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) and abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF (ASCH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSY9.DE | ASCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.55 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 4.32 | -3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | 15.34 | -13.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSY9.DE | ASCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 2.97 | -2.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 2.98 | -2.37 |
Drawdowns
CSY9.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSY9.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, which is greater than ASCH.DE's maximum drawdown of -11.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY9.DE and ASCH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSY9.DE | ASCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -11.06% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.48% | -11.06% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -0.61% | -2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -1.77% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 3.12% | -1.12% |
Volatility
CSY9.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) is 2.09%, while abrdn Future Supply Chains UCITS ETF (ASCH.DE) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that CSY9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASCH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSY9.DE | ASCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 5.82% | -3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.48% | 13.19% | -7.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.07% | 16.09% | -8.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 15.82% | -3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.91% | 15.82% | -3.91% |
CSY9.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSY9.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASCH.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSY9.DE vs. ASCH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSY9.DE nor ASCH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSY9.DE and ASCH.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSY9.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSY9.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASCH.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CSY9.DE and 0.60% for ASCH.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSY9.DE and ASCH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer