CSY8.DE vs. XCO2.DE
CSY8.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD) and XCO2.DE (Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CSY8.DE is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders, while XCO2.DE is a Global Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSY8.DE returned 6.40%/yr vs -0.67%/yr for XCO2.DE. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSY8.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XCO2.DE.
Performance
CSY8.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSY8.DE achieves a 12.89% return, which is significantly higher than XCO2.DE's 0.67% return.
CSY8.DE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 12.89%
- 6M
- 13.27%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- —
XCO2.DE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 1.66%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.67%
- 10Y*
- —
CSY8.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSY8.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 12.89% | -2.70% | 13.60% | 12.50% | -11.53% | 31.40% | 24.77% |
XCO2.DE Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.67% | 1.13% | 4.41% | 5.82% | -15.31% | -2.31% | 0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSY8.DE and XCO2.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020 | 0.13 |
Over the past year, CSY8.DE and XCO2.DE have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSY8.DE vs. XCO2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSY8.DE
XCO2.DE
CSY8.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) and Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSY8.DE | XCO2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.11 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 0.70 | +2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 2.22 | +9.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSY8.DE | XCO2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 0.65 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | -0.14 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | -0.16 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
CSY8.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSY8.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, which is greater than XCO2.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY8.DE and XCO2.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSY8.DE | XCO2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.41% | -17.90% | -13.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.99% | -2.36% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.41% | -2.45% | -28.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.41% | -17.26% | -14.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.63% | +7.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.79% | -8.62% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 0.75% | +1.50% |
Volatility
CSY8.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Volatility Comparison
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE) at 0.81%. This indicates that CSY8.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCO2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSY8.DE | XCO2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 0.81% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 2.01% | +8.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 2.55% | +14.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 4.88% | +15.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 5.25% | +15.03% |
CSY8.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSY8.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XCO2.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSY8.DE vs. XCO2.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSY8.DE nor XCO2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSY8.DE and XCO2.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCO2.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCO2.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSY8.DE.
CSY8.DE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XCO2.DE is Global Corporate Bonds. CSY8.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders, while XCO2.DE tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CSY8.DE and 0.15% for XCO2.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSY8.DE and XCO2.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer