CSY8.DE vs. CUS1.L
CSY8.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD) and CUS1.L (iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - CSY8.DE tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders while CUS1.L tracks the Russell 2000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSY8.DE returned 6.40%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for CUS1.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSY8.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for CUS1.L.
Performance
CSY8.DE vs. CUS1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSY8.DE is traded in EUR, while CUS1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CUS1.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSY8.DE achieves a 12.89% return, which is significantly lower than CUS1.L's 17.03% return.
CSY8.DE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 12.89%
- 6M
- 13.27%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- —
CUS1.L
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 17.03%
- 6M
- 16.53%
- 1Y
- 32.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
CSY8.DE vs. CUS1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSY8.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 12.89% | -2.70% | 13.60% | 12.50% | -11.53% | 31.40% | 24.77% |
CUS1.L iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) | 17.03% | -2.67% | 16.92% | 13.66% | -12.04% | 27.76% | 27.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSY8.DE and CUS1.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CSY8.DE and CUS1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSY8.DE vs. CUS1.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSY8.DE
CUS1.L
CSY8.DE vs. CUS1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) and iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUS1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSY8.DE | CUS1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 5.24 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 15.02 | -3.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSY8.DE | CUS1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 2.06 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.39 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.66 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
CSY8.DE vs. CUS1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSY8.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, smaller than the maximum CUS1.L drawdown of -41.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY8.DE and CUS1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSY8.DE | CUS1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.41% | -41.69% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.99% | -6.10% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.41% | -30.63% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.41% | -30.63% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.79% | -7.27% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.14% | +0.11% |
Volatility
CSY8.DE vs. CUS1.L - Volatility Comparison
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) and iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUS1.L) have volatilities of 3.95% and 3.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSY8.DE | CUS1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 3.77% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 10.09% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 15.55% | +1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 19.68% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 20.36% | -0.08% |
CSY8.DE vs. CUS1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSY8.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CUS1.L's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSY8.DE vs. CUS1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSY8.DE nor CUS1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSY8.DE and CUS1.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSY8.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSY8.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for CUS1.L.
CSY8.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders, while CUS1.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CSY8.DE and 0.43% for CUS1.L.
Find the right allocation for CSY8.DE and CUS1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer