CUS1.L vs. USSC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUS1.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L).
CUS1.L and USSC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CUS1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 TR USD. It was launched on Jul 1, 2009. USSC.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 TR USD. It was launched on Feb 18, 2015. Both CUS1.L and USSC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CUS1.L or USSC.L.
Key characteristics
| CUS1.L | USSC.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.40% | 10.40% |
| 1Y Return | 20.43% | 31.86% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.83% | 7.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.80% | 14.33% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.13 | 1.44 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.70 | 2.23 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.03 | 1.84 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.81 | 7.91 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.89% | 3.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.63% | 20.74% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.26% | -48.99% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUS1.L and USSC.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CUS1.L vs. USSC.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CUS1.L achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly lower than USSC.L's 10.40% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CUS1.L vs. USSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUS1.L has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than USSC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CUS1.L vs. USSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUS1.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CUS1.L vs. USSC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CUS1.L nor USSC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CUS1.L vs. USSC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUS1.L drawdown since its inception was -35.26%, smaller than the maximum USSC.L drawdown of -48.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUS1.L and USSC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CUS1.L vs. USSC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUS1.L) is 4.02%, while SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that CUS1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USSC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.