PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSX5.L vs. SPOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSX5.L vs. SPOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSX5.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSX5.L is traded in EUR, while SPOL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPOL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSX5.L achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than SPOL.L's 12.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CSX5.L has outperformed SPOL.L with an annualized return of 10.27%, while SPOL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.57% annualized return.


CSX5.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
1.19%
YTD
6.76%
6M
7.89%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
10.27%

SPOL.L

1D
-3.31%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
12.91%
6M
22.72%
1Y
37.00%
3Y*
28.05%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*
8.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSX5.L vs. SPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSX5.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc
6.76%21.71%11.38%22.29%-8.36%23.37%-2.27%28.04%-11.52%10.61%
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.91%52.85%-0.39%44.52%-22.19%15.34%-18.85%-3.93%-8.83%34.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CSX5.L and SPOL.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2011

0.57

The correlation between CSX5.L and SPOL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSX5.L vs. SPOL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSX5.L
SPOL.L

Financial Services

25.0%
48.0%

Industrials

21.4%
1.9%

Technology

17.0%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
5.4%

Energy

5.3%
16.7%

Healthcare

5.3%

-

Utilities

4.7%
2.0%

Basic Materials

3.5%
9.8%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

CSX5.L
25.0%
SPOL.L
48.0%

Industrials

CSX5.L
21.4%
SPOL.L
1.9%

Technology

CSX5.L
17.0%
SPOL.L
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CSX5.L
9.8%
SPOL.L
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

CSX5.L
5.6%
SPOL.L
5.4%

Energy

CSX5.L
5.3%
SPOL.L
16.7%

Healthcare

CSX5.L
5.3%
SPOL.L

-

Utilities

CSX5.L
4.7%
SPOL.L
2.0%

Basic Materials

CSX5.L
3.5%
SPOL.L
9.8%

Communication Services

CSX5.L
2.5%
SPOL.L
3.2%

Real Estate

CSX5.L

-

SPOL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSX5.L vs. SPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSX5.L
CSX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CSX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CSX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOL.L
SPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSX5.L vs. SPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSX5.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSX5.LSPOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

3.91

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

9.32

-4.69

CSX5.L vs. SPOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSX5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSX5.L and SPOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSX5.LSPOL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.58

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.46

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.31

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.02

+0.42

Drawdowns

CSX5.L vs. SPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSX5.L drawdown since its inception was -37.87%, smaller than the maximum SPOL.L drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSX5.L and SPOL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSX5.LSPOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.87%

-68.19%

+30.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-9.41%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-21.29%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

-47.87%

+24.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.87%

-56.60%

+18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-3.31%

+2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-41.46%

+34.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

3.96%

-0.75%

Volatility

CSX5.L vs. SPOL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSX5.L) is 4.39%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that CSX5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSX5.LSPOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

7.40%

-3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.52%

17.45%

-4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

23.42%

-7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

30.54%

-13.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

27.47%

-9.27%

CSX5.L vs. SPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSX5.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSX5.L vs. SPOL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSX5.L nor SPOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CSX5.L and SPOL.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSX5.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSX5.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.

CSX5.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSX5.L and 0.74% for SPOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSX5.L and SPOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer