CSX vs. GLDM
CSX (CSX Corporation) is a stock, while GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Over the past 5 years, CSX returned 10.68%/yr vs 17.71%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSX vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSX achieves a 37.17% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -4.78% return.
CSX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 41.26%
- YTD
- 37.17%
- 1Y
- 46.94%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 20.24%
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- 6M
- -8.90%
- YTD
- -4.78%
- 1Y
- 22.28%
- 3Y*
- 28.47%
- 5Y*
- 17.71%
- 10Y*
- —
CSX vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSX CSX Corporation | 37.17% | 14.13% | -5.65% | 13.51% | -16.58% | 25.70% | 27.09% | 18.06% | -2.46% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -4.78% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSX and GLDM is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018 | 0.03 |
The correlation between CSX and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSX vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
CSX
GLDM
CSX vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSX Corporation (CSX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.18 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 0.90 | +3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | 2.24 | +8.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSX vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSX drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -26.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSX and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.19% | -26.11% | -43.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.89% | -26.11% | +14.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.44% | -26.11% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -26.11% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -23.86% | +23.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.89% | -6.42% | -9.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 10.51% | -6.05% |
Volatility
CSX vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CSX Corporation (CSX) is 6.06%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that CSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 8.29% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.45% | 23.91% | -7.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.46% | 27.58% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 18.25% | +5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 17.05% | +10.68% |
Dividends
CSX vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
CSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSX CSX Corporation | 1.09% | 1.43% | 1.49% | 1.27% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.15% | 1.33% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 2.00% | 2.70% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSX and GLDM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to CSX (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSX dropped -69.19% vs GLDM's -26.11%.
CSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSX and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer