CSWG.L vs. LGUK.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSWG.L (Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF) and LGUK.L (L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - CSWG.L tracks the MSCI Switzerland NR CHF while LGUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSWG.L returned 7.85%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for LGUK.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSWG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for LGUK.L.

Performance

CSWG.L vs. LGUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L) and L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSWG.L having a 3.71% return and LGUK.L slightly higher at 3.73%.

CSWG.L

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 3.71%
• 6M: 6.61%
• 1Y: 15.88%
• 3Y*: 9.05%
• 5Y*: 7.85%
• 10Y*: 10.09%

LGUK.L

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 3.73%
• 6M: 8.03%
• 1Y: 17.97%
• 3Y*: 13.62%
• 5Y*: 11.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSWG.L vs. LGUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CSWG.L Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF	3.71%	23.70%	-0.86%	8.57%	-7.50%	19.38%	6.91%	29.09%	-2.54%
LGUK.L L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF	3.73%	24.95%	10.56%	6.64%	5.26%	17.94%	-12.15%	20.11%	-7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CSWG.L and LGUK.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018	0.37

CSWG.L vs. LGUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CSWG.L	LGUK.L
Healthcare	38.2%	14.7%
Financial Services	19.7%	25.3%
Consumer Defensive	14.7%	14.5%
Industrials	13.1%	14.7%
Basic Materials	5.8%	5.9%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	3.7%
Energy	2.7%	12.1%
Communication Services	1.1%	2.5%
Technology	0.8%	0.7%
Real Estate	0.7%	0.6%
Utilities	0.2%	5.5%

Return for Risk

CSWG.L vs. LGUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSWG.L

CSWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
CSWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CSWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CSWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CSWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CSWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

LGUK.L

LGUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 38
LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LGUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
LGUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 37
LGUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
LGUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSWG.L vs. LGUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L) and L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSWG.L	LGUK.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.24	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.84	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.24	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.92	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.16	6.51	-2.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSWG.L vs. LGUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSWG.L and LGUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSWG.L	LGUK.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	1.24	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.82	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	0.52	+0.52

Drawdowns

CSWG.L vs. LGUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSWG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum LGUK.L drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSWG.L and LGUK.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSWG.L	LGUK.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.31%	-33.76%	+15.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.52%	-9.30%	-3.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.52%	-12.30%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.26%	-12.30%	-3.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.76%	-5.71%	+0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.18%	-4.82%	+0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	2.75%	+1.11%

Volatility

CSWG.L vs. LGUK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L) is 4.02%, while L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that CSWG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSWG.L	LGUK.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	4.30%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.38%	12.53%	-2.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.75%	14.42%	-1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.27%	13.86%	+0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.57%	16.31%	+2.26%

CSWG.L vs. LGUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSWG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CSWG.L vs. LGUK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSWG.L nor LGUK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSWG.L and LGUK.L in my portfolio?

CSWG.L and LGUK.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSWG.L or LGUK.L?

On fees, LGUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSWG.L or LGUK.L?

LGUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CSWG.L.

What is the main difference between CSWG.L and LGUK.L?

CSWG.L tracks MSCI Switzerland NR CHF, while LGUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CSWG.L and 0.05% for LGUK.L.